population: be related in ecosystem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents force
Weight: 0.62
, issue
Weight: 0.62
, state
Weight: 0.61
, nation
Weight: 0.61
Siblings first nations
Weight: 0.63
, homeless person
Weight: 0.61
, age
Weight: 0.60
, homeless
Weight: 0.57
, minority
Weight: 0.55

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related in ecosystem 1.00
affect other populations in same ecosystem 0.89
depend in ecosystem 0.88
grow quickly in new ecosystem 0.86
be related to environment 0.82
be related to community 0.77
affect environment 0.76
be related 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(force, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(population, be related in ecosystem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(population, be related in ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(force, be related)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(population, be related in ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(force, be related)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(force, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(population, be related in ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(population, be related in ecosystem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(population, be related in ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(population, be related in ecosystem)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(population, be related in ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(population, affect other populations in same ecosystem)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(population, be related in ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(population, depend in ecosystem)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(population, be related in ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(population, depend in ecosystem)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(population, be related in ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(population, be related to environment)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(population, be related in ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(population, depend in ecosystem)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(population, be related in ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(population, be related in ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(population, be related in ecosystem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(population, be related in ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(population, be related in ecosystem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(population, be related in ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(force, be related)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(population, be related in ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(force, be related)