population: be related to community

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents force
Weight: 0.62
, issue
Weight: 0.62
, state
Weight: 0.61
, nation
Weight: 0.61
Siblings first nations
Weight: 0.63
, homeless person
Weight: 0.61
, age
Weight: 0.60
, homeless
Weight: 0.57
, minority
Weight: 0.55

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to community 1.00
be related 0.83
differ from community 0.81
be related to environment 0.80
be related in ecosystem 0.77
affect natural resources of particular society 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(force, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(population, be related to community)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(population, be related to community) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(force, be related)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(population, be related to community) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(force, be related)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(force, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(population, be related to community) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(population, be related to community)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(population, be related to community) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(population, be related to community)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(population, be related to community) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(population, be related)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(population, be related to community) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(population, differ from community)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(population, be related to community) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(population, differ from community)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(population, be related to community) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(population, be related to environment)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(population, be related to community) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(population, differ from community)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(population, be related to community) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(population, be related to community) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(population, be related to community)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(population, be related to community) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(population, be related to community)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(population, be related to community) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(force, be related)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(population, be related to community) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(force, be related)