pork: be cooked well done

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents meat
Weight: 0.68
, vegetable
Weight: 0.66
, food
Weight: 0.65
, dairy product
Weight: 0.64
, sandwich
Weight: 0.62
Siblings ground beef
Weight: 0.66
, chop
Weight: 0.45
, lunch meat
Weight: 0.38
, meat pie
Weight: 0.38
, beef
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cooked well done 1.00
have cooked thoroughly 0.86
have fully cooked 0.85
is cooked thoroughly 0.85
is fully cooked 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(pork, be cooked well done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(ground beef, is fully cooked)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(pork, be cooked well done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(ground beef, is fully cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(ground beef, is fully cooked)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(pork, be cooked well done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(pork, be cooked well done)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(pork, be cooked well done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(pork, have fully cooked)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(pork, be cooked well done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(pork, have fully cooked)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(pork, be cooked well done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(pork, have fully cooked)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(pork, be cooked well done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(pork, is fully cooked)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(pork, be cooked well done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(pork, is fully cooked)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(pork, be cooked well done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(pork, is fully cooked)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(pork, be cooked well done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(pork, have fully cooked)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(pork, be cooked well done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(pork, is fully cooked)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(pork, be cooked well done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(pork, be cooked well done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(pork, be cooked well done)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(pork, be cooked well done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(pork, be cooked well done)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(pork, be cooked well done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(ground beef, is fully cooked)