pork: is fully cooked

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents meat
Weight: 0.68
, vegetable
Weight: 0.66
, food
Weight: 0.65
, dairy product
Weight: 0.64
, sandwich
Weight: 0.62
Siblings ground beef
Weight: 0.66
, chop
Weight: 0.45
, lunch meat
Weight: 0.38
, meat pie
Weight: 0.38
, beef
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is fully cooked 1.00
have fully cooked 0.99
is cooked thoroughly 0.89
have cooked thoroughly 0.89
be cooked well done 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(pork, is fully cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(ground beef, is fully cooked)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(pork, is fully cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(ground beef, is fully cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(ground beef, is fully cooked)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(pork, is fully cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(pork, is fully cooked)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(pork, is fully cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(pork, have fully cooked)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(pork, is fully cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(pork, have fully cooked)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(pork, is fully cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(pork, have fully cooked)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(pork, is fully cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(pork, have fully cooked)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(pork, is fully cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(pork, be cooked well done)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(pork, is fully cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(pork, be cooked well done)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(pork, is fully cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(pork, be cooked well done)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(pork, is fully cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(pork, be cooked well done)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(pork, is fully cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(pork, is fully cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(pork, is fully cooked)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(pork, is fully cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(pork, is fully cooked)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(pork, is fully cooked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(ground beef, is fully cooked)