pornstar: be paid more than male pornstars

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents girl
Weight: 0.52
, model
Weight: 0.39
, stripper
Weight: 0.34
, star
Weight: 0.33
Siblings whore
Weight: 0.32
, chick
Weight: 0.32
, alice
Weight: 0.31
, betty
Weight: 0.31
, girl scout
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be paid more than male pornstars 1.00
is paid less 0.81
get paid 0.76
is paid 0.76
be paid 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(model, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(pornstar, be paid more than male pornstars)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(stripper, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(pornstar, be paid more than male pornstars)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pornstar, be paid more than male pornstars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(model, get paid)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pornstar, be paid more than male pornstars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(stripper, be paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pornstar, be paid more than male pornstars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(stripper, be paid)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pornstar, be paid more than male pornstars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(model, get paid)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(model, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(pornstar, be paid more than male pornstars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(pornstar, be paid more than male pornstars)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(stripper, be paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(pornstar, be paid more than male pornstars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(pornstar, be paid more than male pornstars)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pornstar, be paid more than male pornstars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(pornstar, be paid more than male pornstars)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(pornstar, be paid more than male pornstars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(pornstar, is paid less)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(pornstar, be paid more than male pornstars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(pornstar, is paid less)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pornstar, be paid more than male pornstars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(pornstar, is paid less)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(pornstar, be paid more than male pornstars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(pornstar, get paid)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(pornstar, be paid more than male pornstars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(pornstar, get paid)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(pornstar, be paid more than male pornstars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(pornstar, is paid)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(pornstar, be paid more than male pornstars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(pornstar, is paid)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(pornstar, be paid more than male pornstars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(pornstar, be paid)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(pornstar, be paid more than male pornstars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(pornstar, be paid)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pornstar, be paid more than male pornstars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(pornstar, get paid)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pornstar, be paid more than male pornstars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(pornstar, is paid)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pornstar, be paid more than male pornstars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(pornstar, be paid)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(pornstar, be paid more than male pornstars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(pornstar, be paid)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(pornstar, be paid more than male pornstars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(pornstar, is paid less)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(pornstar, be paid more than male pornstars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(pornstar, is paid)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(pornstar, be paid more than male pornstars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pornstar, get paid)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(pornstar, be paid more than male pornstars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(pornstar, be paid more than male pornstars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pornstar, be paid more than male pornstars)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pornstar, be paid more than male pornstars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(pornstar, be paid more than male pornstars)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pornstar, be paid more than male pornstars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(stripper, be paid)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pornstar, be paid more than male pornstars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(model, get paid)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(pornstar, be paid more than male pornstars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(model, get paid)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(pornstar, be paid more than male pornstars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(stripper, be paid)