portal: is good game

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents website
Weight: 0.70
, web site
Weight: 0.66
, resource
Weight: 0.64
, web
Weight: 0.60
Siblings internet service provider
Weight: 0.70
, search engine
Weight: 0.68
, yahoo
Weight: 0.64
, marketplace
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good game 1.00
is game 0.94
has quality good 0.76
is awesome 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(web, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(portal, is good game)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(portal, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(web, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(portal, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(web, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(portal, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(search engine, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(web, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(portal, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(portal, is good game)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(portal, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(search engine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(search engine, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(portal, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(portal, is good game)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(portal, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(portal, is game)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(portal, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(portal, is game)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(portal, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(portal, is game)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(portal, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(portal, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(portal, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(portal, is awesome)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(portal, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(portal, is game)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(portal, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(portal, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(portal, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(portal, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(portal, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(portal, is awesome)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(portal, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(portal, is awesome)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(portal, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(portal, is awesome)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(portal, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(portal, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(portal, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(portal, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(portal, is good game)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(portal, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(portal, is good game)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(portal, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(web, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(portal, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(search engine, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(portal, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(web, has quality good)