portfolio: be considered alternative reporting system

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents collection
Weight: 0.58
, tool
Weight: 0.57
, service
Weight: 0.56
, solution
Weight: 0.56
Siblings internet service provider
Weight: 0.31
, operating system
Weight: 0.31
, leverage
Weight: 0.31
, management
Weight: 0.31
, service station
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered alternative reporting system 1.00
be considered reporting system 0.93
be called operating systems 0.76
be called systems 0.75
be in business system work 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(service, be in business system work)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(portfolio, be considered alternative reporting system)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(portfolio, be considered alternative reporting system)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(service, be in business system work)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(portfolio, be considered alternative reporting system)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(service, be in business system work)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(portfolio, be considered alternative reporting system)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(operating system, be called operating systems)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(portfolio, be considered alternative reporting system)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(operating system, be called systems)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(service, be in business system work)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(portfolio, be considered alternative reporting system)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(portfolio, be considered alternative reporting system)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(portfolio, be considered alternative reporting system)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(operating system, be called operating systems)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(operating system, be called operating systems)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(portfolio, be considered alternative reporting system)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(operating system, be called systems)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(operating system, be called systems)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(portfolio, be considered alternative reporting system)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(portfolio, be considered alternative reporting system)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(portfolio, be considered alternative reporting system)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(portfolio, be considered reporting system)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(portfolio, be considered alternative reporting system)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(portfolio, be considered reporting system)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(portfolio, be considered alternative reporting system)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(portfolio, be considered reporting system)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(portfolio, be considered alternative reporting system)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(portfolio, be considered reporting system)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(portfolio, be considered alternative reporting system)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(portfolio, be considered alternative reporting system)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(portfolio, be considered alternative reporting system)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(portfolio, be considered alternative reporting system)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(portfolio, be considered alternative reporting system)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(portfolio, be considered alternative reporting system)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(service, be in business system work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(portfolio, be considered alternative reporting system)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(operating system, be called operating systems)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(portfolio, be considered alternative reporting system)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(operating system, be called systems)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(portfolio, be considered alternative reporting system)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(service, be in business system work)