possum: have in new zealand pests

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents marsupial
Weight: 0.68
, wild animal
Weight: 0.64
, creature
Weight: 0.59
, mammal
Weight: 0.53
, animal
Weight: 0.52
Siblings sugar glider
Weight: 0.56
, rabbit
Weight: 0.37
, wallaby
Weight: 0.37
, kangaroo
Weight: 0.37
, opossum
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
have in new zealand pests 1.00
have in zealand pests 0.99
be pest in new zealand 0.95
be pest in zealand 0.93
has state pests 0.87
be in new zealand 0.86
be bad in new zealand 0.86
be problem in new zealand 0.85
be in zealand 0.85
be bad in zealand 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(possum, have in new zealand pests)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(wallaby, have in new zealand pests)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(possum, have in new zealand pests)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(wallaby, has state pests)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(possum, have in new zealand pests)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(wallaby, have in zealand pests)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(possum, have in new zealand pests)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(wallaby, have in zealand pests)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(wallaby, have in zealand pests)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(possum, have in new zealand pests)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(wallaby, have in new zealand pests)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(wallaby, have in new zealand pests)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(possum, have in new zealand pests)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(wallaby, has state pests)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(wallaby, has state pests)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(possum, have in new zealand pests)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(possum, have in new zealand pests)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(possum, have in new zealand pests)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(possum, be pest in new zealand)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(possum, have in new zealand pests)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(possum, be pest in zealand)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(possum, have in new zealand pests)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(possum, be pest in new zealand)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(possum, have in new zealand pests)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(possum, be pest in zealand)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(possum, have in new zealand pests)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(possum, be pest in zealand)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(possum, have in new zealand pests)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(possum, be pest in new zealand)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(possum, have in new zealand pests)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(possum, be in new zealand)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(possum, have in new zealand pests)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(possum, be bad in new zealand)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(possum, have in new zealand pests)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(possum, be problem in new zealand)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(possum, have in new zealand pests)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(possum, be in new zealand)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(possum, have in new zealand pests)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(possum, be in new zealand)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(possum, have in new zealand pests)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(possum, be pest in new zealand)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(possum, have in new zealand pests)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(possum, be pest in zealand)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(possum, have in new zealand pests)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(possum, be bad in new zealand)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(possum, have in new zealand pests)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(possum, be problem in new zealand)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(possum, have in new zealand pests)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(possum, be bad in new zealand)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(possum, have in new zealand pests)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(possum, be problem in new zealand)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(possum, have in new zealand pests)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(possum, be bad in new zealand)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(possum, have in new zealand pests)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(possum, be problem in new zealand)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(possum, have in new zealand pests)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(possum, be in new zealand)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(possum, have in new zealand pests)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(possum, have in new zealand pests)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(possum, have in new zealand pests)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(possum, have in new zealand pests)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(possum, have in new zealand pests)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(possum, have in new zealand pests)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(wallaby, have in zealand pests)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(possum, have in new zealand pests)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(wallaby, have in new zealand pests)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(possum, have in new zealand pests)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(wallaby, has state pests)