pot: has physical part holes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cooking utensil
Weight: 0.65
, container
Weight: 0.60
, time
Weight: 0.58
, dish
Weight: 0.57
Siblings frying pan
Weight: 0.35
, wooden spoon
Weight: 0.34
, spoon
Weight: 0.34
, toaster oven
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part holes 1.00
need drainage holes 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(container, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(pot, has physical part holes)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(pot, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(container, has physical part holes)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(pot, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(container, has physical part holes)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(pot, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(wooden spoon, has physical part holes)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(pot, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(spoon, has physical part holes)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(container, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(pot, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(pot, has physical part holes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(pot, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(wooden spoon, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(wooden spoon, has physical part holes)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(pot, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(spoon, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(spoon, has physical part holes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(pot, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(pot, has physical part holes)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(pot, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(pot, need drainage holes)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(pot, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(pot, need drainage holes)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(pot, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(pot, need drainage holes)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(pot, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(pot, need drainage holes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(pot, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(pot, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(pot, has physical part holes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(pot, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(pot, has physical part holes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(pot, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(container, has physical part holes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(pot, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(wooden spoon, has physical part holes)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(pot, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(spoon, has physical part holes)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(pot, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(container, has physical part holes)