potato: be at resturant

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dairy product
Weight: 0.69
, salad
Weight: 0.67
, vegetable
Weight: 0.67
, staple
Weight: 0.65
, crop
Weight: 0.64
Siblings french fry
Weight: 0.57
, fruit salad
Weight: 0.38
, vegetable oil
Weight: 0.38
, cauliflower
Weight: 0.37
, onion
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at resturant 1.00
be at restaraunt 0.86
be at fast-food restaurant 0.85
be at restaurant kitchen 0.81
be at any restaurant 0.80
be at fast food restaurant 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(potato, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(french fry, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(potato, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(french fry, be at fast food restaurant)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(potato, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(french fry, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(french fry, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(potato, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(french fry, be at fast food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(french fry, be at fast food restaurant)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(potato, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(potato, be at resturant)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(potato, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(potato, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(potato, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(potato, be at restaraunt)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(potato, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(potato, be at restaurant kitchen)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(potato, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(potato, be at any restaurant)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(potato, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(potato, be at restaraunt)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(potato, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(potato, be at restaraunt)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(potato, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(potato, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(potato, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(potato, be at restaraunt)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(potato, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(potato, be at any restaurant)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(potato, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(potato, be at any restaurant)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(potato, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(potato, be at restaurant kitchen)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(potato, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(potato, be at any restaurant)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(potato, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(potato, be at restaurant kitchen)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(potato, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(potato, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(potato, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(potato, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(potato, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(potato, be at restaurant kitchen)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(potato, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(potato, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(potato, be at resturant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(potato, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(potato, be at resturant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(potato, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(french fry, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(potato, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(french fry, be at fast food restaurant)