potato: be at any restaurant

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dairy product
Weight: 0.69
, salad
Weight: 0.67
, vegetable
Weight: 0.67
, staple
Weight: 0.65
, crop
Weight: 0.64
Siblings french fry
Weight: 0.57
, fruit salad
Weight: 0.38
, vegetable oil
Weight: 0.38
, cauliflower
Weight: 0.37
, onion
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at any restaurant 1.00
be at fast-food restaurant 0.92
be at restaurant kitchen 0.87
be at fast food restaurant 0.86
be serve at most restaurant 0.83
be at resturant 0.80
be at restaraunt 0.80
be at pizza 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(vegetable, be serve at most restaurant)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(potato, be at any restaurant)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(potato, be at any restaurant)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(vegetable, be serve at most restaurant)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(potato, be at any restaurant)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(vegetable, be serve at most restaurant)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(potato, be at any restaurant)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(onion, be at pizza)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(potato, be at any restaurant)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(french fry, be at fast food restaurant)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(potato, be at any restaurant)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(french fry, be at fast-food restaurant)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(vegetable, be serve at most restaurant)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(potato, be at any restaurant)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(potato, be at any restaurant)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(potato, be at any restaurant)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(french fry, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(french fry, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(potato, be at any restaurant)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(french fry, be at fast food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(french fry, be at fast food restaurant)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(potato, be at any restaurant)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(onion, be at pizza)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(onion, be at pizza)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(potato, be at any restaurant)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(potato, be at any restaurant)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(potato, be at any restaurant)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(potato, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(potato, be at any restaurant)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(potato, be at restaurant kitchen)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(potato, be at any restaurant)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(potato, be at restaraunt)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(potato, be at any restaurant)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(potato, be at resturant)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(potato, be at any restaurant)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(potato, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(potato, be at any restaurant)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(potato, be at resturant)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(potato, be at any restaurant)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(potato, be at resturant)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(potato, be at any restaurant)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(potato, be at restaraunt)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(potato, be at any restaurant)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(potato, be at restaraunt)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(potato, be at any restaurant)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(potato, be at resturant)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(potato, be at any restaurant)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(potato, be at restaraunt)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(potato, be at any restaurant)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(potato, be at restaurant kitchen)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(potato, be at any restaurant)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(potato, be at restaurant kitchen)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(potato, be at any restaurant)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(potato, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(potato, be at any restaurant)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(potato, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(potato, be at any restaurant)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(potato, be at restaurant kitchen)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(potato, be at any restaurant)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(potato, be at any restaurant)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(potato, be at any restaurant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(potato, be at any restaurant)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(potato, be at any restaurant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(potato, be at any restaurant)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(vegetable, be serve at most restaurant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(potato, be at any restaurant)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(french fry, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(potato, be at any restaurant)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(french fry, be at fast food restaurant)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(potato, be at any restaurant)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(onion, be at pizza)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(potato, be at any restaurant)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(vegetable, be serve at most restaurant)