vegetable: be serve at most restaurant

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fresh food
Weight: 0.65
, grocery store
Weight: 0.64
, food
Weight: 0.62
, staple
Weight: 0.60
, raw material
Weight: 0.59
Siblings eggplant
Weight: 0.75
, radish
Weight: 0.74
, cauliflower
Weight: 0.73
, kale
Weight: 0.71
, beet
Weight: 0.70

Related properties

Property Similarity
be serve at most restaurant 1.00
be serve in restaurant 0.95
be serve at restaurant 0.95
be find in restaurant 0.88
be at in restaurant 0.87
be at fast-food restaurant 0.86
be at restaurant 0.86
be serve in dish 0.83
be available in restaurant 0.80
be purchase in pizzeria 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(food, be serve in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(vegetable, be serve at most restaurant)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(food, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(vegetable, be serve at most restaurant)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(food, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(vegetable, be serve at most restaurant)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(food, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(vegetable, be serve at most restaurant)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(food, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(vegetable, be serve at most restaurant)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(food, be available in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(vegetable, be serve at most restaurant)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(vegetable, be serve at most restaurant)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(food, be at restaurant)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(vegetable, be serve at most restaurant)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(food, be at restaurant)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(vegetable, be serve at most restaurant)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(food, be serve in restaurant)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(vegetable, be serve at most restaurant)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(food, be available in restaurant)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(vegetable, be serve at most restaurant)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(food, be at in restaurant)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(vegetable, be serve at most restaurant)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(food, be at fast-food restaurant)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(vegetable, be serve at most restaurant)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(food, be serve in restaurant)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(vegetable, be serve at most restaurant)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(food, be at in restaurant)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(vegetable, be serve at most restaurant)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(food, be at restaurant)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(vegetable, be serve at most restaurant)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(food, be at restaurant)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(vegetable, be serve at most restaurant)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(vegetable, be serve at most restaurant)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(food, be available in restaurant)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(food, be serve in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(vegetable, be serve at most restaurant)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(vegetable, be serve at most restaurant)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(food, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(vegetable, be serve at most restaurant)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(vegetable, be serve at most restaurant)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(food, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(vegetable, be serve at most restaurant)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(vegetable, be serve at most restaurant)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(food, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(vegetable, be serve at most restaurant)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(vegetable, be serve at most restaurant)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(food, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(vegetable, be serve at most restaurant)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(vegetable, be serve at most restaurant)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(food, be available in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(vegetable, be serve at most restaurant)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(vegetable, be serve at most restaurant)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(vegetable, be serve at most restaurant)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(vegetable, be serve at most restaurant)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(vegetable, be serve at most restaurant)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(vegetable, be serve in dish)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(vegetable, be serve at most restaurant)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(vegetable, be serve in dish)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(vegetable, be serve at most restaurant)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(vegetable, be serve in dish)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(vegetable, be serve at most restaurant)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(vegetable, be serve in dish)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(vegetable, be serve at most restaurant)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(vegetable, be serve at most restaurant)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(vegetable, be serve at most restaurant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(vegetable, be serve at most restaurant)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(vegetable, be serve at most restaurant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(vegetable, be serve at most restaurant)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(food, be serve in restaurant)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(vegetable, be serve at most restaurant)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(food, be at in restaurant)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(vegetable, be serve at most restaurant)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(vegetable, be serve at most restaurant)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(food, be at restaurant)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(vegetable, be serve at most restaurant)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(food, be at restaurant)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(vegetable, be serve at most restaurant)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(food, be available in restaurant)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(vegetable, be serve at most restaurant)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(food, be serve in restaurant)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(vegetable, be serve at most restaurant)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(food, be at in restaurant)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(vegetable, be serve at most restaurant)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(vegetable, be serve at most restaurant)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(food, be at restaurant)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(vegetable, be serve at most restaurant)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(food, be at restaurant)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(vegetable, be serve at most restaurant)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(food, be available in restaurant)