food: be available in restaurant

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food
Weight: 0.75
, grocery store
Weight: 0.67
, staple
Weight: 0.66
, fuel
Weight: 0.63
Siblings pet food
Weight: 0.88
, junk food
Weight: 0.74
, fresh food
Weight: 0.74
, fresh fruit
Weight: 0.73
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property Similarity
be available in restaurant 1.00
be find in restaurant 0.84
be at in restaurant 0.83
be at fast-food restaurant 0.83
be at restaurant 0.83
be serve in restaurant 0.81
be serve at restaurant 0.81
be at cheap restaurant 0.80
be at fast food restaurant 0.78
be purchase in pizzeria 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(fast food, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(food, be available in restaurant)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(food, be available in restaurant)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(fast food, be at fast food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(food, be available in restaurant)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(food, be available in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(food, be available in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(fast food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(food, be available in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(fast food, be at fast food restaurant)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(food, be available in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(food, be available in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(food, be available in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at fast food restaurant)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(food, be available in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be at fast-food restaurant)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(fast food, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(food, be available in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(food, be available in restaurant)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(food, be available in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(food, be available in restaurant)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(fast food, be at fast food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(food, be available in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(food, be available in restaurant)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(food, be available in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(junk food, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(junk food, be at fast-food restaurant)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(food, be available in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(food, be available in restaurant)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(food, be available in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(food, be available in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(food, be at in restaurant)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(food, be available in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(food, be at restaurant)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(food, be available in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(food, be at restaurant)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(food, be available in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(food, be serve in restaurant)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(food, be available in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(food, be at in restaurant)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(food, be available in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(food, be at restaurant)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(food, be available in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(food, be at restaurant)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(food, be available in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(food, be serve in restaurant)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(food, be available in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(food, be at restaurant)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(food, be available in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(food, be at restaurant)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(food, be available in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(food, be available in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(food, be at in restaurant)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(food, be available in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(food, be serve in restaurant)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(food, be available in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(food, be serve in restaurant)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(food, be available in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(food, be available in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(food, be at in restaurant)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(food, be available in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(food, be at restaurant)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(food, be available in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(food, be at restaurant)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(food, be available in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(food, be at fast-food restaurant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(food, be available in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(food, be available in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(food, be available in restaurant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(food, be available in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(food, be available in restaurant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(food, be available in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(fast food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(food, be available in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(fast food, be at fast food restaurant)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(food, be available in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(food, be available in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(junk food, be at fast-food restaurant)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(food, be available in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(fast food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(food, be available in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(fast food, be at fast food restaurant)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(food, be available in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)