potato: be better than white

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dairy product
Weight: 0.69
, salad
Weight: 0.67
, vegetable
Weight: 0.67
, staple
Weight: 0.65
, crop
Weight: 0.64
Siblings potato salad
Weight: 0.75
, sweet potato
Weight: 0.74
, french fry
Weight: 0.57
, tomato sauce
Weight: 0.38
, fruit salad
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than white 1.00
be healthier than white 0.88
be better than white potato 0.85
be harder than white potatoes 0.83
be healthier than white potatoes 0.82
be healthier than white potato 0.81
be better than potatoes 0.79
be healthier than other potatoes 0.77
be better than ordinary potato 0.77
be better than potato 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(potato, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be better than white)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(potato, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be healthier than white)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(potato, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be harder than white potatoes)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(potato, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be better than white potato)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(potato, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be healthier than white potatoes)
...

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(potato, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(sweet potato, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, be better than white)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(potato, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(sweet potato, be healthier than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, be healthier than white)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(potato, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(sweet potato, be better than white potato) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, be better than white potato)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(potato, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(sweet potato, be harder than white potatoes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, be harder than white potatoes)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(potato, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(sweet potato, be healthier than white potatoes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, be healthier than white potatoes)
...

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(potato, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(potato, be better than white)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(potato, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(potato, be healthier than white)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(potato, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(potato, be healthier than white)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(potato, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(potato, be healthier than white)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(potato, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(potato, be better than potatoes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(potato, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(potato, be better than potatoes)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(potato, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(potato, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(potato, be better than white)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(potato, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(potato, be better than white)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(potato, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(sweet potato, be better than potatoes)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(potato, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(sweet potato, be better than potato)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(potato, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(sweet potato, be better than ordinary potato)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(potato, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(sweet potato, be better than white)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(potato, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sweet potato, be harder than white potatoes)
...