potato: has physical part eyes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dairy product
Weight: 0.69
, salad
Weight: 0.67
, vegetable
Weight: 0.67
, staple
Weight: 0.65
, crop
Weight: 0.64
Siblings potato salad
Weight: 0.75
, sweet potato
Weight: 0.74
, french fry
Weight: 0.57
, tomato sauce
Weight: 0.38
, fruit salad
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part eyes 1.00
have important eyes 0.89
has physical part quick 0.81
has physical part fat 0.79
has physical part veins 0.77
has physical part root 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(potato, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(tomato sauce, has physical part quick)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(potato, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, has physical part veins)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(potato, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, has physical part root)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(potato, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(french fry, has physical part quick)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(potato, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(french fry, has physical part fat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(potato, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(tomato sauce, has physical part quick) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(tomato sauce, has physical part quick)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(potato, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(french fry, has physical part quick) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(french fry, has physical part quick)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(potato, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(sweet potato, has physical part veins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, has physical part veins)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(potato, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(french fry, has physical part fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(french fry, has physical part fat)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(potato, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(sweet potato, has physical part root) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, has physical part root)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(potato, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(potato, has physical part eyes)

Similarity expansion

0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(potato, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(potato, has physical part root)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(potato, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(potato, has physical part root)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(potato, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(potato, has physical part root)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(potato, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(potato, has physical part root)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(potato, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(potato, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(potato, has physical part eyes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(potato, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(potato, has physical part eyes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(potato, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(sweet potato, has physical part veins)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(potato, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(sweet potato, has physical part root)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(potato, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(tomato sauce, has physical part quick)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(potato, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(french fry, has physical part quick)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(potato, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(french fry, has physical part fat)