potato: is salad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dairy product
Weight: 0.69
, salad
Weight: 0.67
, vegetable
Weight: 0.67
, staple
Weight: 0.65
, crop
Weight: 0.64
Siblings potato salad
Weight: 0.75
, sweet potato
Weight: 0.74
, french fry
Weight: 0.57
, tomato sauce
Weight: 0.38
, fruit salad
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
is salad 1.00
be called fries 0.80
is sauteed 0.80
was named fries 0.80
be important in meal 0.79
be called vegetables 0.78
is vegetables 0.78
is crunchy 0.78
make dish healthier 0.78
be in smoothies 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(salad, be important in meal)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(potato, is salad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(vegetable, be called vegetables)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(potato, is salad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(vegetable, is vegetables)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(potato, is salad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(potato, is salad)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(vegetable, is vegetables)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(potato, is salad)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(vegetable, be called vegetables)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(potato, is salad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(salad, be important in meal)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(potato, is salad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(salad, be important in meal)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(potato, is salad)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(vegetable, be called vegetables)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(potato, is salad)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(vegetable, is vegetables)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(potato, is salad)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(french fry, be called fries)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(potato, is salad)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(french fry, was named fries)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(potato, is salad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, make dish healthier)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(potato, is salad)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(potato salad, is salad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(salad, be important in meal)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(potato, is salad)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(potato, is salad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(vegetable, be called vegetables)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(potato, is salad)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(potato, is salad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(vegetable, is vegetables)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(potato, is salad)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(potato, is salad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(potato, is salad)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(potato salad, is salad)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(potato salad, is salad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(potato, is salad)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(sweet potato, make dish healthier)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, make dish healthier)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(potato, is salad)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(french fry, be called fries)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(french fry, be called fries)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(potato, is salad)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(french fry, was named fries)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(french fry, was named fries)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(potato, is salad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(potato, is salad)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(potato, is salad)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(potato, is vegetables)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(potato, is salad)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(potato, is vegetables)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(potato, is salad)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(potato, is vegetables)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(potato, is salad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(potato, is vegetables)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(potato, is salad)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(potato, is salad)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(potato, is salad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(potato, is salad)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(potato, is salad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(potato, is salad)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(vegetable, is vegetables)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(potato, is salad)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(vegetable, be called vegetables)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(potato, is salad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(salad, be important in meal)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(potato, is salad)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(potato salad, is salad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(potato, is salad)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(sweet potato, make dish healthier)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(potato, is salad)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(french fry, be called fries)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(potato, is salad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(french fry, was named fries)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(potato, is salad)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(vegetable, is vegetables)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(potato, is salad)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(vegetable, be called vegetables)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(potato, is salad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(salad, be important in meal)