french fry: was named fries

Property	Similarity
was named fries	1.00
be called fries	0.95
was named french fries	0.94
be called french fries	0.89
be called fries yahoo	0.88
be called french fries yahoo	0.84
is fried	0.79
is fried twice	0.76
be called french fry	0.75
be called fry	0.75

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(french fry, was named fries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Plausible(french fry, be called fries)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.32

Salient(french fry, was named fries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Salient(french fry, be called fries)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.57

Typical(french fry, was named fries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Typical(french fry, is fried)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.30

Remarkable(french fry, was named fries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(french fry, be called fries)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.57

Typical(french fry, was named fries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Typical(french fry, be called fries)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.57

Typical(french fry, was named fries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Typical(french fry, be called french fry)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.30

Remarkable(french fry, was named fries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(french fry, be called fries yahoo)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.32

Salient(french fry, was named fries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Salient(french fry, be called fries yahoo)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.57

Typical(french fry, was named fries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Typical(french fry, be called fry)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.57

Typical(french fry, was named fries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Typical(french fry, be called french fries)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(french fry, was named fries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Plausible(french fry, be called fries yahoo)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.57

Typical(french fry, was named fries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(french fry, was named french fries)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.57

Typical(french fry, was named fries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(french fry, be called fries yahoo)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(french fry, was named fries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Plausible(french fry, is fried)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(french fry, was named fries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Plausible(french fry, be called fry)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(french fry, was named fries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Plausible(french fry, be called french fry)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(french fry, was named fries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Plausible(french fry, be called french fries)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(french fry, was named fries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Plausible(french fry, was named french fries)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.57

Typical(french fry, was named fries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(french fry, be called french fries yahoo)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.32

Salient(french fry, was named fries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Salient(french fry, is fried)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.57

Typical(french fry, was named fries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(french fry, is fried twice)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.32

Salient(french fry, was named fries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Salient(french fry, be called french fries)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.32

Salient(french fry, was named fries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Salient(french fry, be called fry)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(french fry, was named fries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(french fry, be called french fries yahoo)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.30

Remarkable(french fry, was named fries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(french fry, be called french fries yahoo)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.32

Salient(french fry, was named fries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Salient(french fry, be called french fry)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.32

Salient(french fry, was named fries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Salient(french fry, was named french fries)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(french fry, was named fries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(french fry, is fried twice)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.32

Salient(french fry, was named fries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Salient(french fry, be called french fries yahoo)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.30

Remarkable(french fry, was named fries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(french fry, was named french fries)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.30

Remarkable(french fry, was named fries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(french fry, is fried twice)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.30

Remarkable(french fry, was named fries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(french fry, be called french fries)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.32

Salient(french fry, was named fries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Salient(french fry, is fried twice)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.30

Remarkable(french fry, was named fries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(french fry, is fried)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.30

Remarkable(french fry, was named fries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(french fry, be called fry)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.30

Remarkable(french fry, was named fries) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Remarkable(french fry, be called french fry)

Parents	potato Weight: 0.57 , vegetable Weight: 0.47
Siblings	potato salad Weight: 0.33 , sweet potato Weight: 0.33 , tomato sauce Weight: 0.32 , okra Weight: 0.31 , cauliflower Weight: 0.31

french fry: was named fries

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible