french fry: is fried

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents potato
Weight: 0.57
, vegetable
Weight: 0.47
Siblings potato salad
Weight: 0.33
, sweet potato
Weight: 0.33
, tomato sauce
Weight: 0.32
, okra
Weight: 0.31
, cauliflower
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is fried 1.00
is fried twice 0.94
be called fries 0.80
is cooked 0.80
was named fries 0.79
taste cooked 0.79
taste good cooked 0.78
taste good freshly cooked 0.78
taste freshly cooked 0.77
be called okra 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(potato, is cooked)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(french fry, is fried)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(french fry, is fried)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(potato, is cooked)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(french fry, is fried)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(potato, is cooked)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(french fry, is fried)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(okra, be called okra)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(potato, is cooked)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(french fry, is fried)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(french fry, is fried)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(french fry, is fried)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(okra, be called okra)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(okra, be called okra)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(french fry, is fried)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(french fry, is fried)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(french fry, is fried)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(french fry, is fried twice)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(french fry, is fried)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(french fry, be called fries)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(french fry, is fried)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(french fry, was named fries)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(french fry, is fried)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(french fry, is cooked)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(french fry, is fried)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(french fry, taste freshly cooked)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(french fry, is fried)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(french fry, taste good cooked)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(french fry, is fried)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(french fry, taste cooked)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(french fry, is fried)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(french fry, is cooked)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(french fry, is fried)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(french fry, taste good freshly cooked)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(french fry, is fried)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(french fry, be called fries)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(french fry, is fried)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(french fry, is cooked)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(french fry, is fried)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(french fry, was named fries)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(french fry, is fried)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(french fry, be called fries)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(french fry, is fried)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(french fry, is cooked)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(french fry, is fried)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(french fry, is fried twice)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(french fry, is fried)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(french fry, was named fries)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(french fry, is fried)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(french fry, taste freshly cooked)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(french fry, is fried)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(french fry, be called fries)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(french fry, is fried)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(french fry, is fried twice)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(french fry, is fried)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(french fry, taste cooked)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(french fry, is fried)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(french fry, taste good freshly cooked)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(french fry, is fried)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(french fry, taste freshly cooked)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(french fry, is fried)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(french fry, taste good cooked)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(french fry, is fried)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(french fry, taste cooked)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(french fry, is fried)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(french fry, was named fries)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(french fry, is fried)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(french fry, is fried twice)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(french fry, is fried)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(french fry, taste good freshly cooked)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(french fry, is fried)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(french fry, taste cooked)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(french fry, is fried)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(french fry, taste good cooked)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(french fry, is fried)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(french fry, taste freshly cooked)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(french fry, is fried)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(french fry, taste good freshly cooked)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(french fry, is fried)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(french fry, taste good cooked)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(french fry, is fried)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(french fry, is fried)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(french fry, is fried)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(french fry, is fried)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(french fry, is fried)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(french fry, is fried)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(potato, is cooked)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(french fry, is fried)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(okra, be called okra)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(french fry, is fried)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(potato, is cooked)