french fry: is fried twice

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents potato
Weight: 0.57
, vegetable
Weight: 0.47
Siblings potato salad
Weight: 0.33
, sweet potato
Weight: 0.33
, tomato sauce
Weight: 0.32
, okra
Weight: 0.31
, cauliflower
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is fried twice 1.00
is fried 0.94
is cooked twice 0.87
is cooked 0.77
be called fries 0.77
taste good freshly cooked 0.76
was named fries 0.76
taste good cooked 0.76
taste cooked 0.76
taste freshly cooked 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(potato, is cooked)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(french fry, is fried twice)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(french fry, is fried twice)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(potato, is cooked)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(french fry, is fried twice)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(potato, is cooked)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(potato, is cooked)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(french fry, is fried twice)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(french fry, is fried twice)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(french fry, is fried twice)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(french fry, is fried twice)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(french fry, is fried twice)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(french fry, is fried)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(french fry, is fried twice)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(french fry, is fried)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(french fry, is fried twice)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(french fry, is fried)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(french fry, is fried twice)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(french fry, is cooked)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(french fry, is fried twice)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(french fry, be called fries)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(french fry, is fried twice)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(french fry, is cooked)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(french fry, is fried twice)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(french fry, was named fries)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(french fry, is fried twice)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(french fry, be called fries)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(french fry, is fried twice)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(french fry, be called fries)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(french fry, is fried twice)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(french fry, was named fries)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(french fry, is fried twice)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(french fry, is cooked twice)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(french fry, is fried twice)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(french fry, is cooked)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(french fry, is fried twice)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(french fry, is cooked twice)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(french fry, is fried twice)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(french fry, was named fries)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(french fry, is fried twice)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(french fry, be called fries)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(french fry, is fried twice)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(french fry, is cooked twice)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(french fry, is fried twice)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(french fry, is fried)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(french fry, is fried twice)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(french fry, taste freshly cooked)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(french fry, is fried twice)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(french fry, is cooked twice)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(french fry, is fried twice)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(french fry, taste freshly cooked)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(french fry, is fried twice)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(french fry, was named fries)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(french fry, is fried twice)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(french fry, taste cooked)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(french fry, is fried twice)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(french fry, taste good freshly cooked)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(french fry, is fried twice)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(french fry, taste freshly cooked)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(french fry, is fried twice)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(french fry, taste good freshly cooked)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(french fry, is fried twice)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(french fry, taste cooked)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(french fry, is fried twice)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(french fry, taste good cooked)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(french fry, is fried twice)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(french fry, taste freshly cooked)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(french fry, is fried twice)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(french fry, taste good cooked)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(french fry, is fried twice)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(french fry, taste cooked)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(french fry, is fried twice)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(french fry, taste cooked)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(french fry, is fried twice)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(french fry, taste good freshly cooked)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(french fry, is fried twice)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(french fry, taste good freshly cooked)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(french fry, is fried twice)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(french fry, taste good cooked)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(french fry, is fried twice)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(french fry, taste good cooked)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(french fry, is fried twice)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(french fry, is cooked)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(french fry, is fried twice)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(french fry, is fried twice)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(french fry, is fried twice)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(french fry, is fried twice)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(french fry, is fried twice)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(french fry, is fried twice)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(potato, is cooked)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(french fry, is fried twice)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(potato, is cooked)