french fry: is cooked twice

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents potato
Weight: 0.57
, vegetable
Weight: 0.47
Siblings potato salad
Weight: 0.33
, sweet potato
Weight: 0.33
, tomato sauce
Weight: 0.32
, okra
Weight: 0.31
, cauliflower
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is cooked twice 1.00
is cooked 0.92
taste cooked 0.87
is fried twice 0.87
taste good cooked 0.86
taste good freshly cooked 0.83
taste freshly cooked 0.83
cook faster in when small pieces 0.77
be cooked with difficulty at hill station 0.77
is washed twice 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(potato, is cooked)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(french fry, is cooked twice)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(french fry, is cooked twice)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(potato, is cooked)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(french fry, is cooked twice)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(potato, is cooked)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(potato, is cooked)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(french fry, is cooked twice)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(french fry, is cooked twice)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(french fry, is cooked twice)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(french fry, is cooked twice)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(french fry, is cooked twice)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(french fry, is cooked)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(french fry, is cooked twice)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(french fry, is cooked)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(french fry, is cooked twice)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(french fry, is cooked)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(french fry, is cooked twice)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(french fry, is fried twice)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(french fry, is cooked twice)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(french fry, taste cooked)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(french fry, is cooked twice)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(french fry, taste freshly cooked)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(french fry, is cooked twice)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(french fry, taste good cooked)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(french fry, is cooked twice)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(french fry, taste freshly cooked)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(french fry, is cooked twice)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(french fry, taste good freshly cooked)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(french fry, is cooked twice)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(french fry, is fried twice)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(french fry, is cooked twice)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(french fry, is fried twice)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(french fry, is cooked twice)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(french fry, taste cooked)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(french fry, is cooked twice)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(french fry, taste good cooked)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(french fry, is cooked twice)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(french fry, taste cooked)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(french fry, is cooked twice)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(french fry, is fried twice)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(french fry, is cooked twice)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(french fry, taste cooked)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(french fry, is cooked twice)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(french fry, taste freshly cooked)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(french fry, is cooked twice)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(french fry, is cooked)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(french fry, is cooked twice)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(french fry, taste good freshly cooked)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(french fry, is cooked twice)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(french fry, taste freshly cooked)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(french fry, is cooked twice)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(french fry, taste good cooked)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(french fry, is cooked twice)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(french fry, taste good freshly cooked)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(french fry, is cooked twice)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(french fry, taste good cooked)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(french fry, is cooked twice)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(french fry, taste good freshly cooked)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(french fry, is cooked twice)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(french fry, is cooked twice)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(french fry, is cooked twice)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(french fry, is cooked twice)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(french fry, is cooked twice)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(french fry, is cooked twice)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(potato, is cooked)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(french fry, is cooked twice)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(potato, is cooked)