pottery: was important in china

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents handicraft
Weight: 0.70
, item
Weight: 0.61
, art
Weight: 0.59
, medium
Weight: 0.58
, artifact
Weight: 0.57
Siblings needlework
Weight: 0.37
, woodworking
Weight: 0.36
, calligraphy
Weight: 0.35
, quilting
Weight: 0.35
, vase
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
was important in china 1.00
be called china 0.93
was important in ancient china 0.93
was important to phoenicians 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(pottery, was important in china)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(pottery, was important in china)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(pottery, was important in china)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(pottery, be called china)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(pottery, was important in china)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(pottery, be called china)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(pottery, was important in china)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(pottery, be called china)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(pottery, was important in china)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(pottery, was important in ancient china)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(pottery, was important in china)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(pottery, be called china)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(pottery, was important in china)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(pottery, was important in ancient china)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(pottery, was important in china)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(pottery, was important in ancient china)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(pottery, was important in china)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(pottery, was important to phoenicians)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(pottery, was important in china)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(pottery, was important to phoenicians)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(pottery, was important in china)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(pottery, was important to phoenicians)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(pottery, was important in china)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(pottery, was important in ancient china)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(pottery, was important in china)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pottery, was important to phoenicians)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(pottery, was important in china)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(pottery, was important in china)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(pottery, was important in china)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(pottery, was important in china)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(pottery, was important in china)