pottery: was important to phoenicians

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents handicraft
Weight: 0.70
, item
Weight: 0.61
, art
Weight: 0.59
, medium
Weight: 0.58
, artifact
Weight: 0.57
Siblings needlework
Weight: 0.37
, woodworking
Weight: 0.36
, calligraphy
Weight: 0.35
, quilting
Weight: 0.35
, vase
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
was important to phoenicians 1.00
be important in archaeology 0.92
be important today 0.85
be important to mesopotamia people 0.83
be important to people 0.83
be important in history 0.79
be important to times 0.78
was made 0.77
was important in china 0.77
be important in culture 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(art, was made)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(pottery, was important to phoenicians)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(pottery, was important to phoenicians)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(art, was made)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pottery, was important to phoenicians)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(art, was made)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pottery, was important to phoenicians)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, was made)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(art, was made)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(pottery, was important to phoenicians)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(pottery, was important to phoenicians)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(pottery, was important to phoenicians)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(calligraphy, was made)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(calligraphy, was made)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(pottery, was important to phoenicians)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(pottery, was important to phoenicians)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(pottery, was important to phoenicians)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(pottery, be important in archaeology)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(pottery, was important to phoenicians)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(pottery, be important in archaeology)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(pottery, was important to phoenicians)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(pottery, be important in archaeology)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(pottery, was important to phoenicians)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(pottery, be important today)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(pottery, was important to phoenicians)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(pottery, be important today)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(pottery, was important to phoenicians)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(pottery, be important to mesopotamia people)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(pottery, was important to phoenicians)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(pottery, be important to mesopotamia people)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(pottery, was important to phoenicians)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(pottery, be important to people)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(pottery, was important to phoenicians)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(pottery, be important to people)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(pottery, was important to phoenicians)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(pottery, be important today)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(pottery, was important to phoenicians)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(pottery, be important to mesopotamia people)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(pottery, was important to phoenicians)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pottery, be important in history)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(pottery, was important to phoenicians)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(pottery, be important to people)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(pottery, was important to phoenicians)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(pottery, be important in history)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(pottery, was important to phoenicians)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(pottery, was made)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(pottery, was important to phoenicians)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(pottery, be important to times)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(pottery, was important to phoenicians)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(pottery, was made)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(pottery, was important to phoenicians)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(pottery, be important to times)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(pottery, was important to phoenicians)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(pottery, was important in china)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(pottery, was important to phoenicians)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(pottery, was important in china)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(pottery, was important to phoenicians)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(pottery, be important in culture)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(pottery, was important to phoenicians)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(pottery, be important in culture)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(pottery, was important to phoenicians)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(pottery, was made)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(pottery, was important to phoenicians)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(pottery, be important to mesopotamia people)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(pottery, was important to phoenicians)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(pottery, be important in history)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(pottery, was important to phoenicians)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(pottery, be important to times)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(pottery, was important to phoenicians)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(pottery, was important in china)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(pottery, was important to phoenicians)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(pottery, be important in culture)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(pottery, was important to phoenicians)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(pottery, be important in archaeology)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(pottery, was important to phoenicians)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(pottery, be important today)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(pottery, was important to phoenicians)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(pottery, be important in history)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(pottery, was important to phoenicians)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(pottery, was important in china)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(pottery, was important to phoenicians)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(pottery, be important in culture)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(pottery, was important to phoenicians)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(pottery, be important to people)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(pottery, was important to phoenicians)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(pottery, was made)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(pottery, was important to phoenicians)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pottery, be important to times)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(pottery, was important to phoenicians)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(pottery, was important to phoenicians)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pottery, was important to phoenicians)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(pottery, was important to phoenicians)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(pottery, was important to phoenicians)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pottery, was important to phoenicians)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(art, was made)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pottery, was important to phoenicians)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(calligraphy, was made)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(pottery, was important to phoenicians)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(art, was made)