power plant: be located in coastal areas

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents nuclear power plant
Weight: 0.77
, plant
Weight: 0.73
, utility
Weight: 0.68
Siblings natural gas
Weight: 0.70
, nuclear reactor
Weight: 0.69
, hydro
Weight: 0.68
, power
Weight: 0.67
, turbine
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
be located in coastal areas 1.00
be located near water 0.84
be built near ocean 0.77
be near rivers 0.76
be built near water 0.76
were built near water 0.76
be near water 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(nuclear power plant, be located in coastal areas)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(nuclear power plant, be located near water)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(nuclear power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(nuclear power plant, be built near water)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(nuclear power plant, be near water)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(nuclear power plant, be built near ocean)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(nuclear power plant, be near rivers)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(power plant, be located in coastal areas)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, be located in coastal areas)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, be built near ocean)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, be near rivers)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, be located near water)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, be near water)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, be built near water)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, were built near water)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, be built near ocean)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, be near rivers)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, be located in coastal areas)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, were built near water)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, be built near water)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, be near water)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, be located near water)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(nuclear power plant, be located in coastal areas)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(nuclear power plant, be located near water)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(nuclear power plant, were built near water)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(nuclear power plant, be built near water)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(nuclear power plant, be built near ocean)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(nuclear power plant, be near water)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(nuclear power plant, be near rivers)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(power plant, be located in coastal areas)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(power plant, be located in coastal areas)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(power plant, be located near water)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be near rivers)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(power plant, be near rivers)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(power plant, be near rivers)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be built near ocean)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(power plant, be built near ocean)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(power plant, be built near ocean)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(power plant, be near water)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(power plant, be located near water)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(power plant, be near rivers)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(power plant, be built near water)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be located near water)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(power plant, be near water)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be near water)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(power plant, were built near water)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be built near water)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(power plant, were built near water)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(power plant, be built near ocean)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(power plant, be near water)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(power plant, be built near water)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(power plant, be located near water)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(power plant, were built near water)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(power plant, be built near water)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(power plant, were built near water)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be located in coastal areas)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(power plant, be located in coastal areas)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be located in coastal areas)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be located near water)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be near water)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be near rivers)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be built near ocean)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be built near water)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, were built near water)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be located in coastal areas)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be located near water)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be near water)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be near rivers)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be built near ocean)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be built near water)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(power plant, be located in coastal areas)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, were built near water)