predator: adapted to successful at hunting

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.63
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, insect
Weight: 0.59
, movie
Weight: 0.58
, hazard
Weight: 0.58
Siblings grizzly bear
Weight: 0.75
, arctic fox
Weight: 0.73
, spider
Weight: 0.73
, beetle
Weight: 0.72
, owl
Weight: 0.71

Related properties

Property Similarity
adapted to successful at hunting 1.00
be adapted to hunting 0.95
be adapted hunt 0.89
be adapted 0.82
be adapted catch 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(predator, adapted to successful at hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(predator, adapted to successful at hunting)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(predator, adapted to successful at hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(predator, be adapted to hunting)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(predator, adapted to successful at hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(predator, be adapted hunt)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(predator, adapted to successful at hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(predator, be adapted to hunting)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(predator, adapted to successful at hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(predator, be adapted hunt)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(predator, adapted to successful at hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(predator, be adapted to hunting)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(predator, adapted to successful at hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(predator, be adapted hunt)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(predator, adapted to successful at hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(predator, be adapted)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(predator, adapted to successful at hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(predator, be adapted catch)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(predator, adapted to successful at hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(predator, be adapted to hunting)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(predator, adapted to successful at hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(predator, be adapted)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(predator, adapted to successful at hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(predator, be adapted catch)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(predator, adapted to successful at hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(predator, be adapted catch)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(predator, adapted to successful at hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(predator, be adapted)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(predator, adapted to successful at hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(predator, be adapted hunt)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(predator, adapted to successful at hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(predator, be adapted)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(predator, adapted to successful at hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(predator, be adapted catch)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(predator, adapted to successful at hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(predator, adapted to successful at hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(predator, adapted to successful at hunting)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(predator, adapted to successful at hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(predator, adapted to successful at hunting)