pregnant woman: be more prone to foodborne illness

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents woman
Weight: 0.75
, person
Weight: 0.68
, pregnancy
Weight: 0.68
, teenager
Weight: 0.68
Siblings old woman
Weight: 0.42
, young man
Weight: 0.38
, grandmother
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more prone to foodborne illness 1.00
be with toxoplasmosis treated 0.77
get yeast infections 0.76
catch swine flu 0.76
get toxoplasmosis 0.76
get swine flu 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(woman, get yeast infections) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(pregnant woman, be more prone to foodborne illness)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(pregnant woman, be more prone to foodborne illness) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(woman, get yeast infections)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(pregnant woman, be more prone to foodborne illness) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(woman, get yeast infections)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(woman, get yeast infections) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(pregnant woman, be more prone to foodborne illness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(pregnant woman, be more prone to foodborne illness)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(pregnant woman, be more prone to foodborne illness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(pregnant woman, be more prone to foodborne illness)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(pregnant woman, be more prone to foodborne illness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(pregnant woman, be with toxoplasmosis treated)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(pregnant woman, be more prone to foodborne illness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(pregnant woman, get toxoplasmosis)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(pregnant woman, be more prone to foodborne illness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(pregnant woman, get swine flu)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(pregnant woman, be more prone to foodborne illness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(pregnant woman, get yeast infections)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(pregnant woman, be more prone to foodborne illness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(pregnant woman, get toxoplasmosis)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(pregnant woman, be more prone to foodborne illness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(pregnant woman, be with toxoplasmosis treated)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(pregnant woman, be more prone to foodborne illness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(pregnant woman, get swine flu)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(pregnant woman, be more prone to foodborne illness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(pregnant woman, get yeast infections)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(pregnant woman, be more prone to foodborne illness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(pregnant woman, be with toxoplasmosis treated)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(pregnant woman, be more prone to foodborne illness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(pregnant woman, get toxoplasmosis)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(pregnant woman, be more prone to foodborne illness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(pregnant woman, get swine flu)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(pregnant woman, be more prone to foodborne illness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(pregnant woman, get yeast infections)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(pregnant woman, be more prone to foodborne illness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(pregnant woman, be with toxoplasmosis treated)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(pregnant woman, be more prone to foodborne illness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(pregnant woman, get toxoplasmosis)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(pregnant woman, be more prone to foodborne illness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(pregnant woman, get swine flu)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(pregnant woman, be more prone to foodborne illness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(pregnant woman, get yeast infections)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(pregnant woman, be more prone to foodborne illness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(pregnant woman, be more prone to foodborne illness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(pregnant woman, be more prone to foodborne illness)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(pregnant woman, be more prone to foodborne illness) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(pregnant woman, be more prone to foodborne illness)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(pregnant woman, be more prone to foodborne illness) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(woman, get yeast infections)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(pregnant woman, be more prone to foodborne illness) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(woman, get yeast infections)