premium: is quality

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents brand
Weight: 0.68
, item
Weight: 0.60
, value
Weight: 0.60
, feature
Weight: 0.59
Siblings quality
Weight: 0.33
, line item
Weight: 0.32
, equity
Weight: 0.32
, revenue
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is quality 1.00
has quality bad 0.87
has quality worth 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(premium, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(quality, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(premium, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(equity, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(premium, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(quality, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(quality, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(premium, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(equity, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(equity, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(premium, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(premium, is quality)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(premium, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(premium, has quality bad)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(premium, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(premium, has quality bad)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(premium, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(premium, has quality bad)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(premium, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(premium, has quality worth)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(premium, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(premium, has quality worth)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(premium, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(premium, has quality worth)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(premium, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(premium, has quality worth)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(premium, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(premium, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(premium, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(premium, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(premium, is quality)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(premium, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(premium, is quality)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(premium, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(quality, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(premium, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(equity, has quality bad)