premium: rise under obamacare

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents brand
Weight: 0.68
, item
Weight: 0.60
, value
Weight: 0.60
, feature
Weight: 0.59
Siblings quality
Weight: 0.33
, line item
Weight: 0.32
, equity
Weight: 0.32
, revenue
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
rise under obamacare 1.00
increase under obamacare 0.95
have under obamacare increase 0.95
be under obamacare 0.93
go up under obamacare 0.92
increase with obamacare 0.90
be under obamacare going 0.90
be under obamacare going up 0.90
be for obamacare 0.88
be high with obamacare 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(premium, rise under obamacare)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(premium, rise under obamacare)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(premium, rise under obamacare)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(premium, increase with obamacare)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(premium, rise under obamacare)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(premium, be under obamacare)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(premium, rise under obamacare)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(premium, increase with obamacare)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(premium, rise under obamacare)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(premium, increase with obamacare)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(premium, rise under obamacare)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(premium, go up under obamacare)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(premium, rise under obamacare)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(premium, be under obamacare going)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(premium, rise under obamacare)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(premium, be under obamacare)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(premium, rise under obamacare)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(premium, increase with obamacare)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(premium, rise under obamacare)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(premium, increase under obamacare)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(premium, rise under obamacare)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(premium, increase under obamacare)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(premium, rise under obamacare)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(premium, go up under obamacare)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(premium, rise under obamacare)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(premium, increase under obamacare)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(premium, rise under obamacare)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(premium, be for obamacare)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(premium, rise under obamacare)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(premium, be for obamacare)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(premium, rise under obamacare)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(premium, increase under obamacare)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(premium, rise under obamacare)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(premium, be under obamacare going)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(premium, rise under obamacare)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(premium, be for obamacare)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(premium, rise under obamacare)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(premium, have under obamacare increase)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(premium, rise under obamacare)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(premium, go up under obamacare)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(premium, rise under obamacare)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(premium, be under obamacare)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(premium, rise under obamacare)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(premium, be under obamacare going up)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(premium, rise under obamacare)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(premium, be high with obamacare)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(premium, rise under obamacare)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(premium, be high with obamacare)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(premium, rise under obamacare)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(premium, be for obamacare)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(premium, rise under obamacare)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(premium, be under obamacare going)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(premium, rise under obamacare)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(premium, be high with obamacare)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(premium, rise under obamacare)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(premium, go up under obamacare)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(premium, rise under obamacare)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(premium, be under obamacare going up)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(premium, rise under obamacare)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(premium, be under obamacare going)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(premium, rise under obamacare)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(premium, be under obamacare going up)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(premium, rise under obamacare)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(premium, be under obamacare going up)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(premium, rise under obamacare)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(premium, have under obamacare increase)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(premium, rise under obamacare)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(premium, have under obamacare increase)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(premium, rise under obamacare)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(premium, have under obamacare increase)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(premium, rise under obamacare)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(premium, be under obamacare)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(premium, rise under obamacare)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(premium, be high with obamacare)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(premium, rise under obamacare)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(premium, rise under obamacare)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(premium, rise under obamacare)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(premium, rise under obamacare)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(premium, rise under obamacare)