premium: have under obamacare increase

Property	Similarity
have under obamacare increase	1.00
increase under obamacare	1.00
increase with obamacare	0.96
rise under obamacare	0.95
be under obamacare	0.93
go up under obamacare	0.91
be under obamacare going	0.91
be under obamacare going up	0.90
have under increase	0.88
be for obamacare	0.88

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

Salient(premium, have under obamacare increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Salient(premium, increase under obamacare)

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(premium, have under obamacare increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Plausible(premium, increase with obamacare)

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.74

Salient(premium, have under obamacare increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Salient(premium, increase with obamacare)

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.75

Typical(premium, have under obamacare increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(premium, increase under obamacare)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(premium, have under obamacare increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Plausible(premium, increase under obamacare)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.75

Typical(premium, have under obamacare increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Typical(premium, increase with obamacare)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.74

Salient(premium, have under obamacare increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Salient(premium, rise under obamacare)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.75

Typical(premium, have under obamacare increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Typical(premium, rise under obamacare)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.74

Salient(premium, have under obamacare increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Salient(premium, be under obamacare)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(premium, have under obamacare increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Plausible(premium, rise under obamacare)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.74

Salient(premium, have under obamacare increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Salient(premium, go up under obamacare)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.75

Typical(premium, have under obamacare increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Typical(premium, be under obamacare)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.55

Remarkable(premium, have under obamacare increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(premium, increase with obamacare)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.75

Typical(premium, have under obamacare increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Typical(premium, have under increase)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.74

Salient(premium, have under obamacare increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Salient(premium, be under obamacare going)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.74

Salient(premium, have under obamacare increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Salient(premium, be for obamacare)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.55

Remarkable(premium, have under obamacare increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(premium, be under obamacare)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(premium, have under obamacare increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Plausible(premium, go up under obamacare)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.75

Typical(premium, have under obamacare increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(premium, go up under obamacare)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(premium, have under obamacare increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Plausible(premium, be for obamacare)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.75

Typical(premium, have under obamacare increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(premium, be for obamacare)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(premium, have under obamacare increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Plausible(premium, be under obamacare going)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(premium, have under obamacare increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Plausible(premium, have under increase)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.55

Remarkable(premium, have under obamacare increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(premium, increase under obamacare)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.75

Typical(premium, have under obamacare increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(premium, be under obamacare going)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.55

Remarkable(premium, have under obamacare increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(premium, go up under obamacare)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.55

Remarkable(premium, have under obamacare increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Remarkable(premium, be under obamacare going)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.74

Salient(premium, have under obamacare increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Salient(premium, have under increase)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.75

Typical(premium, have under obamacare increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(premium, be under obamacare going up)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.74

Salient(premium, have under obamacare increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Salient(premium, be under obamacare going up)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(premium, have under obamacare increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Plausible(premium, be under obamacare going up)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.55

Remarkable(premium, have under obamacare increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(premium, be for obamacare)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.55

Remarkable(premium, have under obamacare increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(premium, rise under obamacare)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(premium, have under obamacare increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(premium, be under obamacare)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.55

Remarkable(premium, have under obamacare increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(premium, be under obamacare going up)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.55

Remarkable(premium, have under obamacare increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(premium, have under increase)

Parents	brand Weight: 0.68 , item Weight: 0.60 , value Weight: 0.60 , feature Weight: 0.59
Siblings	quality Weight: 0.33 , line item Weight: 0.32 , equity Weight: 0.32 , revenue Weight: 0.32

premium: have under obamacare increase

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible