premium: have under increase

Property	Similarity
have under increase	1.00
have under obamacare increase	0.88
increase	0.88
increase under obamacare	0.87
increase year	0.86
increase with age	0.85
increase year to year	0.81
rise under obamacare	0.80
increase with obamacare	0.79
increase in insurance	0.77

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.26

Typical(premium, have under increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Typical(premium, increase)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(premium, have under increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(premium, have under obamacare increase)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(premium, have under increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(premium, increase under obamacare)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(premium, have under increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Plausible(premium, increase)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(premium, have under increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(premium, increase year)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(premium, have under increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(premium, increase with obamacare)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(premium, have under increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(premium, increase)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(premium, have under increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(premium, increase year to year)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.50

Salient(premium, have under increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Salient(premium, increase)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(premium, have under increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(premium, increase with age)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(premium, have under increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(premium, rise under obamacare)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.50

Salient(premium, have under increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Salient(premium, increase under obamacare)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.50

Salient(premium, have under increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Salient(premium, increase with obamacare)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(premium, have under increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(premium, increase in insurance)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(premium, have under increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Plausible(premium, increase with obamacare)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(premium, have under increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Plausible(premium, increase under obamacare)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.50

Salient(premium, have under increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Salient(premium, rise under obamacare)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.50

Salient(premium, have under increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Salient(premium, increase in insurance)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.26

Typical(premium, have under increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Typical(premium, increase with age)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.50

Salient(premium, have under increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Salient(premium, increase with age)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(premium, have under increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Plausible(premium, increase with age)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(premium, have under increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Plausible(premium, rise under obamacare)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(premium, have under increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Plausible(premium, increase in insurance)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.26

Typical(premium, have under increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Typical(premium, increase with obamacare)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.26

Typical(premium, have under increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(premium, increase under obamacare)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.50

Salient(premium, have under increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Salient(premium, increase year)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.26

Typical(premium, have under increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Typical(premium, rise under obamacare)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.50

Salient(premium, have under increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Salient(premium, have under obamacare increase)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.26

Typical(premium, have under increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Typical(premium, increase in insurance)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(premium, have under increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(premium, increase year)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(premium, have under increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Plausible(premium, have under obamacare increase)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.50

Salient(premium, have under increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Salient(premium, increase year to year)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.26

Typical(premium, have under increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(premium, increase year)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.26

Typical(premium, have under increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(premium, have under obamacare increase)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(premium, have under increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(premium, increase year to year)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.26

Typical(premium, have under increase) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(premium, increase year to year)

Parents	brand Weight: 0.68 , item Weight: 0.60 , value Weight: 0.60 , feature Weight: 0.59
Siblings	quality Weight: 0.33 , line item Weight: 0.32 , equity Weight: 0.32 , revenue Weight: 0.32

premium: have under increase

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings