presentation: be important in technical writing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents performance
Weight: 0.64
, slide
Weight: 0.61
, website
Weight: 0.61
, detail
Weight: 0.60
Siblings lecture
Weight: 0.69
, speaker
Weight: 0.62
, concert
Weight: 0.61
, national convention
Weight: 0.57
, web page
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in technical writing 1.00
be important in writing 0.87
be important at work 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(detail, be important in writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(presentation, be important in technical writing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(presentation, be important in technical writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(detail, be important in writing)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(presentation, be important in technical writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(detail, be important in writing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(detail, be important in writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(presentation, be important in technical writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(presentation, be important in technical writing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(presentation, be important in technical writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(presentation, be important in technical writing)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(presentation, be important in technical writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(presentation, be important in writing)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(presentation, be important in technical writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(presentation, be important in writing)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(presentation, be important in technical writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(presentation, be important in writing)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(presentation, be important in technical writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(presentation, be important at work)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(presentation, be important in technical writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(presentation, be important at work)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(presentation, be important in technical writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(presentation, be important at work)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(presentation, be important in technical writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(presentation, be important in writing)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(presentation, be important in technical writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(presentation, be important at work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(presentation, be important in technical writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(presentation, be important in technical writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(presentation, be important in technical writing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(presentation, be important in technical writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(presentation, be important in technical writing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(presentation, be important in technical writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(detail, be important in writing)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(presentation, be important in technical writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(detail, be important in writing)