presentation: be important in writing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents performance
Weight: 0.64
, slide
Weight: 0.61
, website
Weight: 0.61
, detail
Weight: 0.60
Siblings lecture
Weight: 0.69
, speaker
Weight: 0.62
, concert
Weight: 0.61
, national convention
Weight: 0.57
, web page
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in writing 1.00
be important in technical writing 0.87
be important at work 0.78
be important in life 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(detail, be important in writing)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(presentation, be important in writing)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(detail, be important in life)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(presentation, be important in writing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(presentation, be important in writing)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(detail, be important in writing)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(presentation, be important in writing)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(detail, be important in life)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(presentation, be important in writing)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(detail, be important in writing)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(presentation, be important in writing)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(detail, be important in life)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(detail, be important in writing)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(presentation, be important in writing)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(presentation, be important in writing)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(detail, be important in life)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(presentation, be important in writing)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(presentation, be important in writing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(presentation, be important in writing)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(presentation, be important in writing)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(presentation, be important in writing)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(presentation, be important in technical writing)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(presentation, be important in writing)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(presentation, be important in technical writing)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(presentation, be important in writing)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(presentation, be important in technical writing)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(presentation, be important in writing)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(presentation, be important at work)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(presentation, be important in writing)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(presentation, be important in life)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(presentation, be important in writing)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(presentation, be important at work)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(presentation, be important in writing)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(presentation, be important in life)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(presentation, be important in writing)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(presentation, be important at work)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(presentation, be important in writing)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(presentation, be important in life)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(presentation, be important in writing)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(presentation, be important in technical writing)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(presentation, be important in writing)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(presentation, be important at work)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(presentation, be important in writing)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(presentation, be important in life)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(presentation, be important in writing)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(presentation, be important in writing)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(presentation, be important in writing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(presentation, be important in writing)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(presentation, be important in writing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(presentation, be important in writing)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(detail, be important in writing)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(presentation, be important in writing)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(detail, be important in life)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(presentation, be important in writing)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(detail, be important in writing)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(presentation, be important in writing)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(detail, be important in life)