primary: has quality qualification

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents election
Weight: 0.63
, term
Weight: 0.57
, option
Weight: 0.55
, event
Weight: 0.52
, strategy
Weight: 0.50
Siblings general election
Weight: 0.64
, contest
Weight: 0.30
, race
Weight: 0.30
, probable cause
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality qualification 1.00
is qualified 0.76
is quality 0.75
has quality standard 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(primary, has quality qualification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(general election, is qualified)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(primary, has quality qualification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(general election, is qualified) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(general election, is qualified)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(primary, has quality qualification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(primary, has quality qualification)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(primary, has quality qualification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(primary, is quality)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(primary, has quality qualification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(primary, has quality standard)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(primary, has quality qualification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(primary, has quality standard)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(primary, has quality qualification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(primary, is quality)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(primary, has quality qualification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(primary, is quality)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(primary, has quality qualification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(primary, has quality standard)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(primary, has quality qualification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(primary, is quality)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(primary, has quality qualification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(primary, has quality standard)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(primary, has quality qualification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(primary, has quality qualification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(primary, has quality qualification)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(primary, has quality qualification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(primary, has quality qualification)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(primary, has quality qualification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(general election, is qualified)