primary: has quality standard

Related concepts

Parents	election Weight: 0.63 , term Weight: 0.57 , option Weight: 0.55 , event Weight: 0.52 , strategy Weight: 0.50
Siblings	general election Weight: 0.64 , contest Weight: 0.30 , race Weight: 0.30 , probable cause Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality standard	1.00
is quality	0.86
has quality system	0.84
has quality good	0.83
has quality better	0.83
has quality bad	0.81
has quality wrong	0.75
has quality qualification	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(option, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(primary, has quality standard)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(strategy, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(primary, has quality standard)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(term, has quality system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(primary, has quality standard)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(primary, has quality standard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Plausible(term, has quality system)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(primary, has quality standard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(strategy, has quality good)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(primary, has quality standard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(option, has quality better)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(primary, has quality standard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(option, has quality better)

0.16

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(primary, has quality standard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(strategy, has quality good)

0.13

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(primary, has quality standard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(term, has quality system)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(primary, has quality standard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(general election, has quality wrong)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(primary, has quality standard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(general election, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(strategy, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(primary, has quality standard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Plausible(primary, has quality standard)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(option, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(primary, has quality standard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Plausible(primary, has quality standard)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(term, has quality system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(primary, has quality standard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Plausible(primary, has quality standard)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(primary, has quality standard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

Remarkable(general election, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(general election, has quality good)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(primary, has quality standard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

Remarkable(general election, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Plausible(general election, has quality wrong)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(primary, has quality standard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Salient(primary, has quality standard)

Similarity expansion

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(primary, has quality standard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(primary, is quality)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(primary, has quality standard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(primary, has quality bad)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(primary, has quality standard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(primary, has quality good)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.73

Salient(primary, has quality standard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Salient(primary, is quality)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.49

Typical(primary, has quality standard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(primary, is quality)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(primary, has quality standard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Plausible(primary, is quality)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.73

Salient(primary, has quality standard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Salient(primary, has quality good)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(primary, has quality standard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(primary, has quality qualification)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.73

Salient(primary, has quality standard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Salient(primary, has quality bad)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.49

Typical(primary, has quality standard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Typical(primary, has quality qualification)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.73

Salient(primary, has quality standard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Salient(primary, has quality qualification)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(primary, has quality standard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Plausible(primary, has quality qualification)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(primary, has quality standard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(primary, has quality good)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.49

Typical(primary, has quality standard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(primary, has quality good)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(primary, has quality standard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(primary, has quality bad)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.49

Typical(primary, has quality standard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(primary, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

Salient(primary, has quality standard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(primary, has quality standard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(primary, has quality standard)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(primary, has quality standard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(primary, has quality standard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(primary, has quality standard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Typical(term, has quality system)

0.19

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(primary, has quality standard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(strategy, has quality good)

0.16

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(primary, has quality standard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(option, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(primary, has quality standard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(general election, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(primary, has quality standard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(general election, has quality wrong)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.49

Typical(primary, has quality standard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Typical(term, has quality system)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.49

Typical(primary, has quality standard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(strategy, has quality good)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.49

Typical(primary, has quality standard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(option, has quality better)