primate: be considered most intelligent mammals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.69
, wild animal
Weight: 0.67
, creature
Weight: 0.54
, man
Weight: 0.53
Siblings bonobo
Weight: 0.72
, monkey
Weight: 0.70
, spider monkey
Weight: 0.70
, baboon
Weight: 0.67
, great ape
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered most intelligent mammals 1.00
be considered intelligent mammals 0.98
be considered mammals 0.90
is mammals 0.86
be different from mammals 0.84
be different from other mammals 0.84
have like humans 0.78
exist as primates 0.76
were called primates 0.75
be called primates 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(primate, be considered most intelligent mammals)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(monkey, is mammals)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(primate, be considered most intelligent mammals)
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(monkey, is mammals)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(monkey, is mammals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(primate, be considered most intelligent mammals)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(primate, be considered most intelligent mammals)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(primate, be considered most intelligent mammals)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(primate, is mammals)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(primate, be considered most intelligent mammals)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(primate, is mammals)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(primate, be considered most intelligent mammals)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(primate, be different from mammals)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(primate, be considered most intelligent mammals)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(primate, is mammals)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(primate, be considered most intelligent mammals)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(primate, be different from mammals)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(primate, be considered most intelligent mammals)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(primate, be different from mammals)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(primate, be considered most intelligent mammals)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(primate, be different from other mammals)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(primate, be considered most intelligent mammals)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(primate, be different from other mammals)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(primate, be considered most intelligent mammals)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(primate, be different from other mammals)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(primate, be considered most intelligent mammals)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(primate, exist as primates)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(primate, be considered most intelligent mammals)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(primate, exist as primates)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(primate, be considered most intelligent mammals)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(primate, exist as primates)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(primate, be considered most intelligent mammals)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(primate, were called primates)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(primate, be considered most intelligent mammals)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(primate, have like humans)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(primate, be considered most intelligent mammals)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(primate, were called primates)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(primate, be considered most intelligent mammals)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(primate, be called primates)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(primate, be considered most intelligent mammals)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(primate, were called primates)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(primate, be considered most intelligent mammals)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(primate, be called primates)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(primate, be considered most intelligent mammals)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(primate, have like humans)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(primate, be considered most intelligent mammals)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(primate, be called primates)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(primate, be considered most intelligent mammals)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(primate, have like humans)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(primate, be considered most intelligent mammals)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(primate, be different from other mammals)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(primate, be considered most intelligent mammals)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(primate, be different from mammals)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(primate, be considered most intelligent mammals)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(primate, is mammals)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(primate, be considered most intelligent mammals)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(primate, have like humans)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(primate, be considered most intelligent mammals)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(primate, be called primates)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(primate, be considered most intelligent mammals)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(primate, were called primates)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(primate, be considered most intelligent mammals)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(primate, exist as primates)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(primate, be considered most intelligent mammals)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(primate, be considered most intelligent mammals)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(primate, be considered most intelligent mammals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(primate, be considered most intelligent mammals)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(primate, be considered most intelligent mammals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(primate, be considered most intelligent mammals)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(monkey, is mammals)