primate: have like humans

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.69
, wild animal
Weight: 0.67
, creature
Weight: 0.54
, man
Weight: 0.53
Siblings bonobo
Weight: 0.72
, monkey
Weight: 0.70
, spider monkey
Weight: 0.70
, baboon
Weight: 0.67
, great ape
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
have like humans 1.00
be different from other mammals 0.82
exist as primates 0.80
be different from mammals 0.80
be animals use 0.78
be considered mammals 0.78
be considered most intelligent mammals 0.78
be considered intelligent mammals 0.78
is mammals 0.77
has state primates 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(primate, have like humans)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(monkey, is mammals)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(primate, have like humans)
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(monkey, is mammals)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(monkey, is mammals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(primate, have like humans)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(primate, have like humans)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(primate, have like humans)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(primate, exist as primates)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(primate, have like humans)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(primate, be animals use)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(primate, have like humans)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(primate, is mammals)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(primate, have like humans)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(primate, be different from mammals)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(primate, have like humans)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(primate, exist as primates)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(primate, have like humans)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(primate, be different from other mammals)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(primate, have like humans)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(primate, be different from mammals)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(primate, have like humans)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(primate, exist as primates)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(primate, have like humans)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(primate, be animals use)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(primate, have like humans)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(primate, be animals use)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(primate, have like humans)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(primate, is mammals)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(primate, have like humans)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(primate, is mammals)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(primate, have like humans)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(primate, be different from mammals)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(primate, have like humans)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(primate, be different from other mammals)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(primate, have like humans)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(primate, be different from other mammals)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(primate, have like humans)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(primate, be different from other mammals)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(primate, have like humans)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(primate, be considered most intelligent mammals)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(primate, have like humans)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(primate, has state primates)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(primate, have like humans)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(primate, be considered most intelligent mammals)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(primate, have like humans)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(primate, be different from mammals)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(primate, have like humans)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(primate, exist as primates)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(primate, have like humans)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(primate, be animals use)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(primate, have like humans)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(primate, has state primates)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(primate, have like humans)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(primate, is mammals)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(primate, have like humans)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(primate, has state primates)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(primate, have like humans)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(primate, has state primates)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(primate, have like humans)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(primate, be considered most intelligent mammals)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(primate, have like humans)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(primate, be considered most intelligent mammals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(primate, have like humans)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(primate, have like humans)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(primate, have like humans)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(primate, have like humans)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(primate, have like humans)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(primate, have like humans)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(monkey, is mammals)