prison: be bad overcrowding

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents facility
Weight: 0.60
, structure
Weight: 0.58
, place
Weight: 0.57
, situation
Weight: 0.57
, officer
Weight: 0.57
Siblings bastille
Weight: 0.40
, jail
Weight: 0.37
, workhouse
Weight: 0.35
, courthouse
Weight: 0.33
, capital punishment
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad overcrowding 1.00
is overcrowding 0.98
deal with overcrowding 0.96
is overcrowded 0.86
was overcrowded in 1700s 0.85
be overcrowded in us 0.85
be overcrowded in states 0.83
be overcrowded in united states 0.78
overcrowd problem 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(prison, be bad overcrowding)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(jail, is overcrowded)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(prison, be bad overcrowding)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(jail, is overcrowded)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(jail, is overcrowded)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(prison, be bad overcrowding)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(prison, be bad overcrowding)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(prison, be bad overcrowding)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(prison, is overcrowding)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(prison, be bad overcrowding)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(prison, deal with overcrowding)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(prison, be bad overcrowding)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(prison, is overcrowding)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(prison, be bad overcrowding)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(prison, is overcrowded)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(prison, be bad overcrowding)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(prison, is overcrowding)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(prison, be bad overcrowding)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(prison, deal with overcrowding)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(prison, be bad overcrowding)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(prison, was overcrowded in 1700s)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(prison, be bad overcrowding)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(prison, be overcrowded in us)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(prison, be bad overcrowding)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(prison, be overcrowded in united states)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(prison, be bad overcrowding)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(prison, was overcrowded in 1700s)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(prison, be bad overcrowding)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(prison, is overcrowded)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(prison, be bad overcrowding)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(prison, was overcrowded in 1700s)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(prison, be bad overcrowding)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(prison, was overcrowded in 1700s)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(prison, be bad overcrowding)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(prison, deal with overcrowding)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(prison, be bad overcrowding)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(prison, be overcrowded in us)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(prison, be bad overcrowding)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(prison, is overcrowded)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(prison, be bad overcrowding)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(prison, be overcrowded in united states)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(prison, be bad overcrowding)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(prison, be overcrowded in us)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(prison, be bad overcrowding)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(prison, is overcrowding)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(prison, be bad overcrowding)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(prison, be overcrowded in united states)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(prison, be bad overcrowding)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(prison, be overcrowded in us)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(prison, be bad overcrowding)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(prison, deal with overcrowding)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(prison, be bad overcrowding)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(prison, is overcrowded)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(prison, be bad overcrowding)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(prison, be overcrowded in united states)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(prison, be bad overcrowding)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(prison, be bad overcrowding)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(prison, be bad overcrowding)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(prison, be bad overcrowding)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(prison, be bad overcrowding)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(prison, be bad overcrowding)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(jail, is overcrowded)