prison: was overcrowded in 1700s

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents facility
Weight: 0.60
, structure
Weight: 0.58
, place
Weight: 0.57
, situation
Weight: 0.57
, officer
Weight: 0.57
Siblings bastille
Weight: 0.40
, jail
Weight: 0.37
, workhouse
Weight: 0.35
, courthouse
Weight: 0.33
, capital punishment
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
was overcrowded in 1700s 1.00
is overcrowded 0.99
be overcrowded in us 0.96
be overcrowded in states 0.95
be overcrowded in united states 0.89
is overcrowding 0.86
be bad overcrowding 0.85
deal with overcrowding 0.83
is overpopulated 0.83
get overpopulated 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(prison, was overcrowded in 1700s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(jail, is overcrowded)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(prison, was overcrowded in 1700s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(jail, is overcrowded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(jail, is overcrowded)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(prison, was overcrowded in 1700s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(prison, was overcrowded in 1700s)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(prison, was overcrowded in 1700s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(prison, is overcrowded)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(prison, was overcrowded in 1700s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(prison, be overcrowded in us)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(prison, was overcrowded in 1700s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(prison, be overcrowded in united states)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(prison, was overcrowded in 1700s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(prison, is overcrowded)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(prison, was overcrowded in 1700s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(prison, is overcrowding)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(prison, was overcrowded in 1700s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(prison, was overcrowded in 1700s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(prison, was overcrowded in 1700s)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(prison, was overcrowded in 1700s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(prison, was overcrowded in 1700s)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(prison, was overcrowded in 1700s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(jail, is overcrowded)