prison: is understaffed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents facility
Weight: 0.60
, structure
Weight: 0.58
, place
Weight: 0.57
, situation
Weight: 0.57
, officer
Weight: 0.57
Siblings bastille
Weight: 0.40
, jail
Weight: 0.37
, workhouse
Weight: 0.35
, courthouse
Weight: 0.33
, capital punishment
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is understaffed 1.00
is overcrowded 0.79
was overcrowded in 1700s 0.79
be overcrowded in us 0.78
be overcrowded in states 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(prison, is understaffed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(jail, is overcrowded)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(prison, is understaffed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(jail, is overcrowded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(jail, is overcrowded)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(prison, is understaffed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(prison, is understaffed)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(prison, is understaffed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(prison, is overcrowded)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(prison, is understaffed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(prison, was overcrowded in 1700s)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(prison, is understaffed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(prison, be overcrowded in us)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(prison, is understaffed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(prison, was overcrowded in 1700s)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(prison, is understaffed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(prison, is overcrowded)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(prison, is understaffed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(prison, is understaffed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(prison, is understaffed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(prison, is understaffed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(prison, is understaffed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(prison, is understaffed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(jail, is overcrowded)