process: evaluation of be can process

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mechanism
Weight: 0.66
, approach
Weight: 0.66
, step
Weight: 0.63
, method
Weight: 0.62
Siblings fermentation
Weight: 0.68
, digestion
Weight: 0.67
, chemical reaction
Weight: 0.66
, extraction
Weight: 0.66
, photosynthesis
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
evaluation of be can process 1.00
evaluation of be can ongoing process 0.95
evaluation 0.92
is analysis 0.76
validation 0.75
experience greater learning curves than automated process 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(process, evaluation of be can process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(process, evaluation of be can process)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(process, evaluation of be can process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(process, evaluation of be can ongoing process)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(process, evaluation of be can process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(process, evaluation)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(process, evaluation of be can process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(process, evaluation)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(process, evaluation of be can process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(process, evaluation)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(process, evaluation of be can process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(process, evaluation)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(process, evaluation of be can process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(process, experience greater learning curves than automated process)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(process, evaluation of be can process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(process, validation)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(process, evaluation of be can process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(process, is analysis)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(process, evaluation of be can process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(process, evaluation of be can ongoing process)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(process, evaluation of be can process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(process, evaluation of be can ongoing process)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(process, evaluation of be can process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(process, evaluation of be can ongoing process)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(process, evaluation of be can process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(process, is analysis)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(process, evaluation of be can process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(process, is analysis)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(process, evaluation of be can process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(process, is analysis)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(process, evaluation of be can process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(process, validation)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(process, evaluation of be can process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(process, experience greater learning curves than automated process)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(process, evaluation of be can process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(process, experience greater learning curves than automated process)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(process, evaluation of be can process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(process, validation)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(process, evaluation of be can process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(process, validation)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(process, evaluation of be can process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(process, experience greater learning curves than automated process)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(process, evaluation of be can process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(process, evaluation of be can process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(process, evaluation of be can process)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(process, evaluation of be can process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(process, evaluation of be can process)