process: is analysis

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mechanism
Weight: 0.66
, approach
Weight: 0.66
, step
Weight: 0.63
, method
Weight: 0.62
Siblings fermentation
Weight: 0.68
, digestion
Weight: 0.67
, chemical reaction
Weight: 0.66
, extraction
Weight: 0.66
, photosynthesis
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
is analysis 1.00
analysis 1.00
evaluation 0.79
evaluation of be can process 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(process, is analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(process, is analysis)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(process, is analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(process, analysis)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(process, is analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(process, analysis)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(process, is analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(process, analysis)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(process, is analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(process, analysis)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(process, is analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(process, evaluation)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(process, is analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(process, evaluation)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(process, is analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(process, evaluation of be can process)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(process, is analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(process, evaluation of be can process)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(process, is analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(process, evaluation)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(process, is analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(process, evaluation)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(process, is analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(process, evaluation of be can process)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(process, is analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(process, evaluation of be can process)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(process, is analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(process, is analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(process, is analysis)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(process, is analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(process, is analysis)