produce: be expensive in florida

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fresh food
Weight: 0.60
, department
Weight: 0.54
, cause
Weight: 0.54
, ingredient
Weight: 0.52
Siblings raw material
Weight: 0.66
, berry
Weight: 0.60
, paddy
Weight: 0.41
, fresh fruit
Weight: 0.33
, fruit
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be expensive in florida 1.00
be expensive in usa 0.85
be expensive in hawaii 0.83
be expensive in india 0.83
be expensive in australia 0.80
be expensive in korea 0.80
be expensive in japan 0.79
be in japan expensive 0.79
be in sydney expensive 0.79
is kentucky 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(produce, be expensive in florida)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(berry, be expensive in india)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(produce, be expensive in florida)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be expensive in japan)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(produce, be expensive in florida)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(berry, be expensive in australia)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(produce, be expensive in florida)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(fresh fruit, be expensive in japan)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(produce, be expensive in florida)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(fresh fruit, be in sydney expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(produce, be expensive in florida)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(berry, is kentucky)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(produce, be expensive in florida)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(fresh fruit, be in sydney expensive)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(fresh fruit, be in sydney expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(produce, be expensive in florida)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(berry, be expensive in india)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(berry, be expensive in india)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(produce, be expensive in florida)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(fruit, be expensive in japan)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(fruit, be expensive in japan)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(produce, be expensive in florida)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(berry, is kentucky)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(berry, is kentucky)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(produce, be expensive in florida)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(fresh fruit, be expensive in japan)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(fresh fruit, be expensive in japan)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(produce, be expensive in florida)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(berry, be expensive in australia)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(berry, be expensive in australia)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(produce, be expensive in florida)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(produce, be expensive in florida)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(produce, be expensive in florida)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(produce, be expensive in japan)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(produce, be expensive in florida)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(produce, be expensive in japan)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(produce, be expensive in florida)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(produce, be expensive in hawaii)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(produce, be expensive in florida)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(produce, be expensive in japan)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(produce, be expensive in florida)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(produce, be expensive in japan)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(produce, be expensive in florida)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(produce, be expensive in hawaii)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(produce, be expensive in florida)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(produce, be expensive in hawaii)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(produce, be expensive in florida)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(produce, be expensive in hawaii)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(produce, be expensive in florida)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(produce, be expensive in florida)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(produce, be expensive in florida)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(produce, be expensive in florida)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(produce, be expensive in florida)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(produce, be expensive in florida)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(berry, be expensive in india)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(produce, be expensive in florida)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(fresh fruit, be in sydney expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(produce, be expensive in florida)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(fresh fruit, be expensive in japan)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(produce, be expensive in florida)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(fruit, be expensive in japan)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(produce, be expensive in florida)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(berry, is kentucky)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(produce, be expensive in florida)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(berry, be expensive in australia)