product: seem work best with rational advertising campaigns

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dairy product
Weight: 0.85
, niche
Weight: 0.62
, search engine
Weight: 0.62
, marketplace
Weight: 0.61
Siblings carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.70
, soy sauce
Weight: 0.68
, potato chip
Weight: 0.68
, mouthwash
Weight: 0.67
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
seem work best with rational advertising campaigns 1.00
seem work with rational advertising campaigns 0.99
seem work best with advertising campaigns 0.96
seem work with advertising campaigns 0.94
thrive without advertising 0.82
seem work best 0.79
be important in marketing 0.77
rank ads 0.77
seem work 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(search engine, rank ads) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(product, seem work best with rational advertising campaigns)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(product, seem work best with rational advertising campaigns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(search engine, rank ads)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(product, seem work best with rational advertising campaigns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(search engine, rank ads)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(search engine, rank ads) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(product, seem work best with rational advertising campaigns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(product, seem work best with rational advertising campaigns)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(product, seem work best with rational advertising campaigns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(product, seem work best with rational advertising campaigns)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(product, seem work best with rational advertising campaigns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(product, be important in marketing)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(product, seem work best with rational advertising campaigns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(product, be important in marketing)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(product, seem work best with rational advertising campaigns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(product, be important in marketing)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(product, seem work best with rational advertising campaigns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(product, be important in marketing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(product, seem work best with rational advertising campaigns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(product, seem work best with rational advertising campaigns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(product, seem work best with rational advertising campaigns)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(product, seem work best with rational advertising campaigns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(product, seem work best with rational advertising campaigns)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(product, seem work best with rational advertising campaigns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(search engine, rank ads)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(product, seem work best with rational advertising campaigns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(search engine, rank ads)