production: be in agriculture

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents adaptation
Weight: 0.62
, business activity
Weight: 0.60
, sector
Weight: 0.59
, aspect
Weight: 0.58
, variable
Weight: 0.58
Siblings consumption
Weight: 0.58
, manufacturing
Weight: 0.34
, oil company
Weight: 0.33
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.32
, film
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in agriculture 1.00
be called agriculture 0.98
be called agricultural sector 0.90
affect cotton farmers 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(sector, be called agriculture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(production, be in agriculture)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sector, be called agricultural sector) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(production, be in agriculture)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(production, be in agriculture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(sector, be called agriculture)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(production, be in agriculture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(sector, be called agricultural sector)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(production, be in agriculture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(sector, be called agriculture)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(production, be in agriculture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(sector, be called agricultural sector)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(production, be in agriculture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(manufacturing, affect cotton farmers)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(sector, be called agriculture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(production, be in agriculture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(production, be in agriculture)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sector, be called agricultural sector) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(production, be in agriculture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(production, be in agriculture)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(production, be in agriculture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(manufacturing, affect cotton farmers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(manufacturing, affect cotton farmers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(production, be in agriculture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(production, be in agriculture)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(production, be in agriculture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(production, be in agriculture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(production, be in agriculture)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(production, be in agriculture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(production, be in agriculture)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(production, be in agriculture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(sector, be called agriculture)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(production, be in agriculture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(sector, be called agricultural sector)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(production, be in agriculture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(manufacturing, affect cotton farmers)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(production, be in agriculture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(sector, be called agriculture)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(production, be in agriculture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(sector, be called agricultural sector)