professional: have code of ethics

Property	Similarity
have code of ethics	1.00
need code of ethics	0.99
is ethics	0.93
have code	0.88
need code	0.86
deal with ethics issues	0.85
deal with ethics issues on plagiarism	0.82
be subject to codes of conduct	0.81
be subject to strict codes of conduct	0.80
be subject to codes	0.79

0.80

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(professional, have code of ethics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(professional, need code of ethics)

0.79

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.15

Typical(professional, have code of ethics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Typical(professional, need code of ethics)

0.78

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.15

Typical(professional, have code of ethics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(professional, is ethics)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(professional, have code of ethics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(professional, is ethics)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(professional, have code of ethics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(professional, have code)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.15

Typical(professional, have code of ethics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(professional, need code)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(professional, have code of ethics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(professional, need code)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(professional, have code of ethics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Plausible(professional, is ethics)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(professional, have code of ethics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(professional, deal with ethics issues)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(professional, have code of ethics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(professional, deal with ethics issues on plagiarism)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(professional, have code of ethics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(professional, need code of ethics)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.65

Salient(professional, have code of ethics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Salient(professional, need code of ethics)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(professional, have code of ethics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(professional, be subject to strict codes of conduct)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.65

Salient(professional, have code of ethics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Salient(professional, is ethics)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.15

Typical(professional, have code of ethics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Typical(professional, have code)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(professional, have code of ethics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(professional, be subject to codes of conduct)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(professional, have code of ethics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(professional, be subject to codes)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.65

Salient(professional, have code of ethics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Salient(professional, have code)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(professional, have code of ethics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Plausible(professional, need code)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.65

Salient(professional, have code of ethics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Salient(professional, need code)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(professional, have code of ethics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(professional, have code)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.65

Salient(professional, have code of ethics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Salient(professional, deal with ethics issues on plagiarism)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.65

Salient(professional, have code of ethics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Salient(professional, be subject to codes)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.65

Salient(professional, have code of ethics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Salient(professional, deal with ethics issues)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.15

Typical(professional, have code of ethics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(professional, be subject to codes of conduct)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.65

Salient(professional, have code of ethics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Salient(professional, be subject to strict codes of conduct)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.65

Salient(professional, have code of ethics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Salient(professional, be subject to codes of conduct)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(professional, have code of ethics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Plausible(professional, be subject to codes)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(professional, have code of ethics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Plausible(professional, be subject to codes of conduct)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(professional, have code of ethics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(professional, deal with ethics issues)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.15

Typical(professional, have code of ethics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Typical(professional, be subject to codes)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(professional, have code of ethics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(professional, deal with ethics issues on plagiarism)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(professional, have code of ethics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(professional, be subject to strict codes of conduct)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.15

Typical(professional, have code of ethics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Typical(professional, deal with ethics issues)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.15

Typical(professional, have code of ethics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(professional, be subject to strict codes of conduct)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.15

Typical(professional, have code of ethics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(professional, deal with ethics issues on plagiarism)

Parents	graduate student Weight: 0.61 , customer Weight: 0.58 , third party Weight: 0.56 , expert Weight: 0.55
Siblings	staff Weight: 0.67 , team Weight: 0.65 , realtor Weight: 0.64 , entrepreneur Weight: 0.62 , counselor Weight: 0.62

professional: have code of ethics

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings