profit: be important to businesses

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents value
Weight: 0.60
, motive
Weight: 0.60
, report
Weight: 0.59
, statement
Weight: 0.58
Siblings cent
Weight: 0.60
, speculator
Weight: 0.42
, revenue
Weight: 0.35
, equity
Weight: 0.32
, bank statement
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to businesses 1.00
be important to small businesses 0.96
be important to businesses in sector 0.91
be important to sector businesses 0.91
be important to business 0.88
be important to businesses in private sector 0.88
be important to private sector businesses 0.88
be important in business 0.88
be important for business 0.87
be important to companies 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(value, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(profit, be important to businesses)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(value, be important to companies)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(profit, be important to businesses)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(report, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(profit, be important to businesses)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(profit, be important to businesses)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(report, be important in business)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(profit, be important to businesses)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(value, be important in business)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(profit, be important to businesses)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(value, be important to companies)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(profit, be important to businesses)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(value, be important to companies)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(profit, be important to businesses)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(value, be important in business)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(profit, be important to businesses)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(report, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(profit, be important to businesses)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(revenue, be important in business)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(profit, be important to businesses)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(revenue, be important to business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(value, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(profit, be important to businesses)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(profit, be important to businesses)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(report, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(profit, be important to businesses)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(profit, be important to businesses)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(value, be important to companies)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(profit, be important to businesses)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(profit, be important to businesses)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(profit, be important to businesses)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(revenue, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(revenue, be important to business)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(profit, be important to businesses)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(revenue, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(revenue, be important in business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(profit, be important to businesses)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(profit, be important to businesses)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(profit, be important to businesses)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(profit, be important to small businesses)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(profit, be important to businesses)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(profit, be important to small businesses)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(profit, be important to businesses)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(profit, be important to businesses in sector)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(profit, be important to businesses)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(profit, be important to businesses in sector)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(profit, be important to businesses)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(profit, be important to private sector businesses)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(profit, be important to businesses)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(profit, be important to businesses in private sector)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(profit, be important to businesses)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(profit, be important to business)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(profit, be important to businesses)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(profit, be important to businesses in private sector)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(profit, be important to businesses)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(profit, be important to private sector businesses)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(profit, be important to businesses)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(profit, be important to businesses in sector)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(profit, be important to businesses)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(profit, be important to business)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(profit, be important to businesses)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(profit, be important for business)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(profit, be important to businesses)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(profit, be important for business)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(profit, be important to businesses)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(profit, be important to businesses in sector)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(profit, be important to businesses)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(profit, be important to business)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(profit, be important to businesses)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(profit, be important to business)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(profit, be important to businesses)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(profit, be important for business)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(profit, be important to businesses)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(profit, be important to small businesses)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(profit, be important to businesses)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(profit, be important for business)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(profit, be important to businesses)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(profit, be important to businesses in private sector)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(profit, be important to businesses)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(profit, be important to private sector businesses)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(profit, be important to businesses)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(profit, be important to businesses in private sector)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(profit, be important to businesses)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(profit, be important to private sector businesses)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(profit, be important to businesses)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(profit, be important to small businesses)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(profit, be important to businesses)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(profit, be important to businesses)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(profit, be important to businesses)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(profit, be important to businesses)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(profit, be important to businesses)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(profit, be important to businesses)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(report, be important in business)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(profit, be important to businesses)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(value, be important to companies)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(profit, be important to businesses)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(value, be important in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(profit, be important to businesses)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(revenue, be important to business)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(profit, be important to businesses)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(revenue, be important in business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(profit, be important to businesses)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(report, be important in business)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(profit, be important to businesses)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(value, be important in business)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(profit, be important to businesses)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(value, be important to companies)