profit: is credited

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents value
Weight: 0.60
, motive
Weight: 0.60
, report
Weight: 0.59
, statement
Weight: 0.58
Siblings cent
Weight: 0.60
, speculator
Weight: 0.42
, revenue
Weight: 0.35
, equity
Weight: 0.32
, bank statement
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is credited 1.00
be credited 1.00
be credited in accounting 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(profit, is credited) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(revenue, be credited)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(profit, is credited) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(equity, is credited)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(profit, is credited) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(revenue, be credited in accounting)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(profit, is credited) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(revenue, is credited)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(profit, is credited) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(revenue, is credited) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(revenue, is credited)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(profit, is credited) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(revenue, be credited) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(revenue, be credited)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(profit, is credited) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(equity, is credited) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(equity, is credited)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(profit, is credited) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(revenue, be credited in accounting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(revenue, be credited in accounting)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(profit, is credited) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(profit, is credited)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(profit, is credited) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(profit, is credited) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(profit, is credited)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(profit, is credited) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(profit, is credited)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(profit, is credited) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(revenue, is credited)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(profit, is credited) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(revenue, be credited)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(profit, is credited) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(equity, is credited)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(profit, is credited) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(revenue, be credited in accounting)