programmer: use recursion

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents musician
Weight: 0.62
, talent
Weight: 0.59
, expert
Weight: 0.58
, person
Weight: 0.57
Siblings developer
Weight: 0.57
, computer scientist
Weight: 0.34
, engineer
Weight: 0.34
, scientist
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
use recursion 1.00
use subroutines 0.85
prefer hexadecimal to binary 0.81
use hexadecimal 0.81
use binary 0.80
use hexadecimal numbers 0.80
prefer hexadecimal 0.79
use monospaced fonts 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(programmer, use recursion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(computer scientist, use hexadecimal)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(programmer, use recursion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(computer scientist, prefer hexadecimal)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(programmer, use recursion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(computer scientist, use binary)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(programmer, use recursion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(computer scientist, use hexadecimal numbers)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(programmer, use recursion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(computer scientist, use hexadecimal numbers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(computer scientist, use hexadecimal numbers)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(programmer, use recursion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(computer scientist, use binary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(computer scientist, use binary)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(programmer, use recursion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(computer scientist, use hexadecimal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(computer scientist, use hexadecimal)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(programmer, use recursion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(computer scientist, prefer hexadecimal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(computer scientist, prefer hexadecimal)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(programmer, use recursion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(programmer, use recursion)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(programmer, use recursion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(programmer, use subroutines)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(programmer, use recursion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(programmer, use subroutines)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(programmer, use recursion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(programmer, use subroutines)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(programmer, use recursion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(programmer, prefer hexadecimal to binary)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(programmer, use recursion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(programmer, use hexadecimal)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(programmer, use recursion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(programmer, use hexadecimal)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(programmer, use recursion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(programmer, use hexadecimal)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(programmer, use recursion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(programmer, use hexadecimal)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(programmer, use recursion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(programmer, prefer hexadecimal to binary)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(programmer, use recursion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(programmer, use hexadecimal numbers)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(programmer, use recursion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(programmer, use subroutines)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(programmer, use recursion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(programmer, prefer hexadecimal to binary)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(programmer, use recursion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(programmer, prefer hexadecimal to binary)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(programmer, use recursion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(programmer, use hexadecimal numbers)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(programmer, use recursion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(programmer, use hexadecimal numbers)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(programmer, use recursion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(programmer, use monospaced fonts)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(programmer, use recursion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(programmer, use hexadecimal numbers)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(programmer, use recursion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(programmer, use monospaced fonts)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(programmer, use recursion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(programmer, use monospaced fonts)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(programmer, use recursion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(programmer, use monospaced fonts)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(programmer, use recursion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(programmer, use recursion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(programmer, use recursion)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(programmer, use recursion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(programmer, use recursion)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(programmer, use recursion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(computer scientist, use hexadecimal)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(programmer, use recursion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(computer scientist, use binary)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(programmer, use recursion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(computer scientist, use hexadecimal numbers)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(programmer, use recursion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(computer scientist, prefer hexadecimal)