programming language: be invented

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents language
Weight: 0.81
, syntax
Weight: 0.67
, computer science
Weight: 0.67
, topic
Weight: 0.64
Siblings source code
Weight: 0.69
, smalltalk
Weight: 0.68
, perl
Weight: 0.68
, lisp
Weight: 0.67
, basic
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
be invented 1.00
was invented 0.98
is invention 0.85
is important invention 0.84
is most important invention 0.81
be developed 0.77
was developed 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(language, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(programming language, be invented)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(language, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(programming language, be invented)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(programming language, be invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(language, was invented)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(programming language, be invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(language, was developed)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(programming language, be invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(language, was invented)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(programming language, be invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(language, was developed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(language, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(programming language, be invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(programming language, be invented)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(language, was developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(programming language, be invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(programming language, be invented)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(programming language, be invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(programming language, be invented)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(programming language, be invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(programming language, be developed)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(programming language, be invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(programming language, be developed)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(programming language, be invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(programming language, be developed)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(programming language, be invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(programming language, be developed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(programming language, be invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(programming language, be invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(programming language, be invented)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(programming language, be invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(programming language, be invented)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(programming language, be invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(language, was developed)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(programming language, be invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(language, was invented)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(programming language, be invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(language, was invented)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(programming language, be invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(language, was developed)