programming language: is quicker

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents language
Weight: 0.81
, syntax
Weight: 0.67
, computer science
Weight: 0.67
, topic
Weight: 0.64
Siblings source code
Weight: 0.69
, smalltalk
Weight: 0.68
, perl
Weight: 0.68
, lisp
Weight: 0.67
, basic
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
is quicker 1.00
is slower 0.85
become easier 0.79
be than faster languages 0.79
be than faster other dynamic languages 0.78
be than faster other languages 0.78
be than faster dynamic languages 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(programming language, is quicker)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(lisp, be than faster other languages)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(programming language, is quicker)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(lisp, be than faster other dynamic languages)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(programming language, is quicker)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(lisp, be than faster dynamic languages)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(programming language, is quicker)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(lisp, be than faster languages)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(programming language, is quicker)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(lisp, be than faster dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(lisp, be than faster dynamic languages)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(programming language, is quicker)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(lisp, be than faster languages)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(lisp, be than faster languages)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(programming language, is quicker)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(lisp, be than faster other dynamic languages)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(lisp, be than faster other dynamic languages)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(programming language, is quicker)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(lisp, be than faster other languages)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(lisp, be than faster other languages)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(programming language, is quicker)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(programming language, is quicker)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(programming language, is quicker)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(programming language, is quicker)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(programming language, is quicker)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(programming language, is quicker)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(programming language, is quicker)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(programming language, is quicker)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(lisp, be than faster dynamic languages)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(programming language, is quicker)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(lisp, be than faster other dynamic languages)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(programming language, is quicker)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(lisp, be than faster languages)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(programming language, is quicker)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(lisp, be than faster other languages)