programming: be in finance related careers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents computer science
Weight: 0.61
, operation
Weight: 0.58
, item
Weight: 0.57
, feature
Weight: 0.57
Siblings computer programming
Weight: 0.71
, tv show
Weight: 0.64
, comedy
Weight: 0.62
, broadcast
Weight: 0.55
, programming language
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in finance related careers 1.00
be in finance careers 0.98
be in finance 0.83
is good career 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(computer science, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(programming, be in finance related careers)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(programming, be in finance related careers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(computer science, is good career)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(programming, be in finance related careers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(computer science, is good career)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(computer science, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(programming, be in finance related careers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(programming, be in finance related careers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(programming, be in finance related careers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(programming, be in finance related careers)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(programming, be in finance related careers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(programming, be in finance careers)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(programming, be in finance related careers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(programming, be in finance careers)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(programming, be in finance related careers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(programming, be in finance careers)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(programming, be in finance related careers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(programming, be in finance careers)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(programming, be in finance related careers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(programming, be in finance)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(programming, be in finance related careers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(programming, be in finance)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(programming, be in finance related careers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(programming, be in finance)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(programming, be in finance related careers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(programming, be in finance)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(programming, be in finance related careers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(programming, be in finance related careers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(programming, be in finance related careers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(programming, be in finance related careers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(programming, be in finance related careers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(programming, be in finance related careers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(computer science, is good career)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(programming, be in finance related careers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(computer science, is good career)